#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To call a river wierdo bet. Owned by a slowplay? Ahead?
I think you have to call. It very well could be some flush or strangely played AK or QJ but it could just be a donkey with Q4s or AQ KQ. At 9-1 I look him up and get a feel for how he plays.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To call a river wierdo bet. Owned by a slowplay? Ahead?
I'm folding to the checkraise.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To call a river wierdo bet. Owned by a slowplay? Ahead?
This being Party 2/4, I wouldn't be surprised to see 98 with one club here, some guy who backed into a straight on the river. But I'd still call his river raise because it could just be TPTK or a worse 2 pair.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To call a river wierdo bet. Owned by a slowplay? Ahead?
I raise here 51%. Call 49% and misclick on fold 1%. If BB being a fish was the villain on the river I would call 90% of the time. I'm sorry but against someone with an aggressive label I really want to raise here. I just can't give him credit for a str8 and the flush is my real concern. I see I'm in the overwhelming minority though so I may have to ease up a little in these situations
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To call a river wierdo bet. Owned by a slowplay? Ahead?
Seems like the consensus is call.
Results in white (not that they matter here): <font color="white"> AQ </font> |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To call a river wierdo bet. Owned by a slowplay? Ahead?
Forget the results! What's really disrurbing is the fact no one noticed I put 101% into my game. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
|