Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-11-2005, 12:31 AM
gusser gusser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

It seems everyone has a huge problem with the cold call preflop. SSH chart recommendations include pocket pairs from EP with a raise in front.
On pg 84
"Many people may be surprised to see that we recommend playing small pocket pairs so often, particularly from early position and against a raise."

He then describes ideal game conditions being loose and aggro both of which apply. Am i missing something here?



gus


--.....oh showdown AA,KT,AK and MHIG
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-11-2005, 12:42 AM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

The first preflop call is not terrible, given the table conditions that you described. But when it's 3-bet and capped, you have to face the very strong probability that there is at least one, probably 2 better pocket pair out there. So I'd say that the first call was borderline under the circumstances, but the second one was not good at all.

The flop call was by far the worst of the hand, though--you don't have nearly the pot odds to call, and there's about a 0% possibility of you having the best hand.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-11-2005, 12:47 AM
Nate tha' Great Nate tha' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

[ QUOTE ]
The first preflop call is not terrible, given the table conditions that you described. But when it's 3-bet and capped, you have to face the very strong probability that there is at least one, probably 2 better pocket pair out there. So I'd say that the first call was borderline under the circumstances, but the second one was not good at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

The second preflop call is unquestionably and overwhelmingly correct.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-11-2005, 12:49 AM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

personally i think hero played the hand perfectly preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-11-2005, 12:55 AM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

[ QUOTE ]
So I'd say that the first call was borderline under the circumstances, but the second one was not good at all.


[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, it's more like the other way around, in that the first call was terrible, and the second call was fine.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-11-2005, 12:56 AM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

[ QUOTE ]
The second preflop call is unquestionably and overwhelmingly correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

I realize his pot odds are there, but he's certainly behind at this point, flopping a set is never a lock that he's improved to the best hand, and he's in between a preflop 3-bettor and capper. This is a ready-made situation for being trapped with a very good 2nd (or 3rd) best hand.

Tack on all the times Hero makes his set but loses to a flush or straight, and I just don't think this is a +EV situation. Someone else can run it through the paces, but I have to think that Hero's equity flat out sucks here.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:00 AM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

given the table description the first call wasn't *terrible*. though even sugggesting folding the deuces the second time around is terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:03 AM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

this is just flat out wrong.

if you knew for a fact that both of the preflop aggressors had AA and KK, folding would be terrible, because they will certainly pay you off if the flop came all rags with a seemingly harmless duece. you'd way make up the bets you need to make the preflop call easily +EV.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:07 AM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

But there are also 3 other players coming along for the ride, which means that even all rainbow rags is not necessarily a safe board.

I don't know, I'll bow to y'alls vast advantage in experience since it looks like most of you disagree with me, but I'm just saying what my gut is telling me. I don't have a link or program or whatever you need to run hand comparisons here, but I still think that given the number of opponents and two players showing lots of aggression preflop, Hero's EV would look pretty poor vs. a range of probable hands.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-11-2005, 01:19 AM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: Ginourmous pot

[ QUOTE ]
But there are also 3 other players coming along for the ride, which means that even all rainbow rags is not necessarily a safe board...but I'm just saying what my gut is telling me.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
...but I still think that given the number of opponents and two players showing lots of aggression preflop, Hero's EV would look pretty poor vs. a range of probable hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Think about what your saying, which is that you don't like your hand because you're likely up against an overpair (quite possibly true), but you're also saying that you don't like making sets on raggedy flops, ostensibly due to the possibility that someone could make a str8 or flush against you (which likely wouldn't be from one of the preflop raisers). The fact is that when you make a set, especially against others who like their hands from the get-go, you are going to win a lot of money in the long-run, even accounting for the times that you do hit your set and lose.

If you are this afraid of playing this type of hand then I wonder if you are playing in a limit over your comfort level?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.