|
|
#12
01-25-2005, 02:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why not. . .
[ QUOTE ]
I like it... suited one gappers are infinately more deceptive than connectors. Not that there was much deception used in this hand... but that's why I like the PF call. [/ QUOTE ] hmmmm I almost never play suited gappers unless they are broadway cards and I can limp from LP. 
|
|
#13
01-25-2005, 02:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why not. . .
lead out, so if you get raised you can push. if they just call your flop c/r you're in a tough spot on the turn...
|
|
#14
01-25-2005, 03:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why not. . .
preflop call is a little thin. i'm probably too tigh from SB and too loose from BB tho.
as for the rest of the hand, you played it fine. I'd prolly lead the flop so i could re-raise all-in to try and give him the big decision to fold or not. one other option if he really sucks is to just call the bet and turn up the heat when you straighten out or check/call a flush down. All read dependant; if he's good i try to get him to fold the flop, if he's bad im trying to get him to gimme his stack. fim
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
