|
|
#11
11-16-2004, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
I notice that you didn't drag-up any old Majorkong posts [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img].
Lost Wages 
|
|
#13
11-16-2004, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
You know his name did show up quite often. I was trying to figure out where I saw that name, then I remembered....
He's on one of my books. Middle Limit Holdem by Bob Ciaffone and Jim Brier Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
11-16-2004, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
True - no MK, Clark or Dynasty. It looks like they were pretty much already beating the games.
One curious thing I did notice about Kong and Clarkmeister - they registered within a day of each other.... Think any emails or phone calls were made? - or did the Poker moons just align right in Sept 02? Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
|
|
#15
11-16-2004, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
[ QUOTE ]
True - no MK, Clark or Dynasty. It looks like they were pretty much already beating the games. One curious thing I did notice about Kong and Clarkmeister - they registered within a day of each other.... Think any emails or phone calls were made? - or did the Poker moons just align right in Sept 02? Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think the forums must've made some switchover or something on 09/02/2002, because most of the better, older posters registered on that date. Rob
|
|
#16
11-16-2004, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] True - no MK, Clark or Dynasty. It looks like they were pretty much already beating the games. One curious thing I did notice about Kong and Clarkmeister - they registered within a day of each other.... Think any emails or phone calls were made? - or did the Poker moons just align right in Sept 02? Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think the forums must've made some switchover or something on 09/02/2002, because most of the better, older posters registered on that date. Rob [/ QUOTE ] You may be on to something. Prior to 9/1/02 or there abouts, everyone shows up as Anonymous for their name - but it's kind of odd, because if someone replies to a post - it will show the name of the poster they are replying to, instead of Anonymous. Did that make any sense? Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
|
|
#17
11-16-2004, 05:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
[ QUOTE ]
Bison started at the micros – and like most of us – had some pretty basic questions. [/ QUOTE ] For the love of god Bison, raise those queens preflop!!!
|
|
#18
11-16-2004, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
Great stuff!
By the way, why do people here use that tinyurl thing rather than the board's own URL Feature down below?
|
|
#19
11-16-2004, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
I'm a class a poker dork and write most of my longer posts in word and then cut and paste into 2+2.
It eaiser than cutting and pasting everything in to 2+2, then having to go back format the links. Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
|
|
#20
11-16-2004, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What? Your not beating the game for 3BB/100 hands?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a class a poker dork and write most of my longer posts in word and then cut and paste into 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] I'm a Class-A copy-editing dork, and it's a shame Word's spell-check doesn't catch all those mistakes you make. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Good thread, though.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
