|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: David Sklansky should change the picture on the back of the 2+2 books to the one that is before his | |||
| Yes |
   
|
45 | 77.59% |
| No |
  
|
13 | 22.41% |
| Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
11-11-2004, 11:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: When will your Peter peter and $20 mil mean more?
It depends what the definition of sex was, it wasnt really specified. I assumed foreplay and hands/tounges etc could still be used.
He definatlety said sex and not orgasm so all is not lost. 
|
|
#12
11-11-2004, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: When will your Peter peter and $20 mil mean more?
[ QUOTE ]
You can make your own poll if you want to micromanage mine so much, as well as the other guy's at the same time. [/ QUOTE ] honestly stopped reading right there. totally lame. you're starting your own polls because you have an obvious interest in the way people are responding. people are responding because of the way they interpret the mechanics. if they are not clearly defined, you are not going to get good answers. you can bother responding to this if you want but i'm not reading that either. it's a waste of time. your position is idiotic and contradictory. either you want to understand people responses or you don't. if you do, you should want the question to be completely clear but you're bitching about it.
|
|
#13
11-11-2004, 07:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: When will your Peter peter and $20 mil mean more?
Astro, your response was the idiotic thing. It's a POLL, not a POSITION. I don't have any position to discuss.
Make your own poll instead of trying to add strange qualifications and extra rules to this one, and then repeatedly insulting me when I say the poll stands as it is. What's the matter with you? You're going nuts over a silly poll. It's just for fun.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
