|
|
#14
09-30-2004, 11:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: question: omaha vs Hold em
[ QUOTE ]
limit or no limit you would see less flops in omaha, hi or 8. even though the hands run closer in omaha. you dont get to bluff as easily. [/ QUOTE ] So are you saying that the hands runs so close together in value, u should play less of them? It might be the tables I play at, but I see somewhere around 30-40% in PLO at the 0.25/0.50 tables and see about 15-25% in NLHE at the same tables. I have been profitable at both tables. But one of the main observations are that the 30-40% of the flops I see, I dump 1/2 of them on the flop. Is this not a wrong type of play? Scotty O 
|
|
#16
10-03-2004, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: question: omaha vs Hold em
[ QUOTE ]
So are you saying that the hands runs so close together in value, u should play less of them? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] So you're saying you should only be seeing 9-11% of flops with Omaha? [/ QUOTE ] Why are you guys trying to rephrase what Ray Zee told you. Why take the "So you are saying..." approach and put words in his mouth?
|
|
#17
10-03-2004, 03:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: question: omaha vs Hold em
Your have to understand the distinctions in the type of games that are being discussed and not contaminate one with the other.
Limit Omaha - 8 or hi Pot-limit Omaha - 8 or hi No-limit Omaha - 8 or hi (not played much, maybe this has changed) and etc differences for hold'em along with the blind structure....yada, yada, yada. Ray's post specifically made statements about Limit and No-limit. No mentioned of Pot-limit was made. -Zeno
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
