#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Putting That Safe Sex Education Class to Work
no. they've been watching CSI and all the other crime investigation shows, and they didn't want any DNA evidence left on the victim.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Putting That Safe Sex Education Class to Work
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder why they bothered with condoms? Her being 76 and likely not active, STDs are unlikely. They also won't get her pregnant since 76 year old women aren't usually fertile. Perhaps they didn't understand their sex education as well as it may seem. [/ QUOTE ] Probably for the simple fact that it is gross, but im sure you can give me 10 reasons on why none of this is wrong [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Putting That Safe Sex Education Class to Work
I don't think sex with a 76 year old is any grosser than any other sort of rape.
~D |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Putting That Safe Sex Education Class to Work
That goes without saying.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Putting That Safe Sex Education Class to Work
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think sex with a 76 year old is any grosser than any other sort of rape. [/ QUOTE ] While I agree that rape is wrong, If I were a rapist Angie Harmon comes way before a 76 year old cripple. To each their own though I guess |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Putting That Safe Sex Education Class to Work
I didn't know what a condom was when I was 11. This one made my night...for the worse [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
~ Rick |
|
|