|
|
#11
08-17-2004, 12:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
[ QUOTE ]
1. There are just not that many super loose 3-6 games online. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] This has not been my experience at all. Unless by "super loose" you mean every player sees every flop, you're way off base. [ QUOTE ] 5. You may wish to take advantage of 6-max tables [/ QUOTE ] SSH is directly applicable to 6-max tables. I would recommend it over HPFAP. 
|
|
#12
08-17-2004, 12:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 6. You may want to keep playing with a super live one, even if nearly everyone else at the table leaves. D. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, only an idiot would play a maniac heads-up... Die, will ya?
|
|
#13
08-17-2004, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
[ QUOTE ]
This has not been my experience at all. Unless by "super loose" you mean every player sees every flop, you're way off base. [/ QUOTE ] In my experience, most online 3/6 games quaily as one of Miller's "tight" loose games.
|
|
#14
08-17-2004, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
[ QUOTE ]
Unless by "super loose" you mean every player sees every flop [/ QUOTE ] No I don't mean that. The 3-6 at party is just not that loose all the time. If you can't handle an old-style vegas 10-20, you are giving up some winnings in these games. [ QUOTE ] SSH is directly applicable to 6-max tables. I would recommend it over HPFAP. [/ QUOTE ] I would suggest knowing both books and also some other material not in print.
|
|
#16
08-17-2004, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, only an idiot would play a maniac heads-up... [/ QUOTE ] I am not sure what you are saying. The live ones are not always maniacs. What is wrong with playing heads-up? [ QUOTE ] Die, will ya? [/ QUOTE ] You talkin to me? D.
|
|
#17
08-17-2004, 01:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yes, only an idiot would play a maniac heads-up... [/ QUOTE ] I am not sure what you are saying. The live ones are not always maniacs. What is wrong with playing heads-up? [ QUOTE ] Die, will ya? [/ QUOTE ] You talkin to me? D. [/ QUOTE ] Youth has spoken. Time for us old farts to head out on the ice floe and get out of the way of the new and improved generation.
|
|
#18
08-17-2004, 01:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
I agree. I just read my copy for the first time and there are many concepts that apply mid-highish games.
This is a must read for any poker player. Orange
|
|
#19
08-17-2004, 02:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why the hell....
B&M games are far easier than online games of the same limit. I can beat my local B&M game for 1-2 BB hour at limits of 10-20 or 15-30. I would probably get crushed at Party 15-30.
It is also very easy to read a player at BM. The table stays the same for an extended period and you can gain much more information about how a player plays by being in their presence.
|
|
#20
08-17-2004, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SSH is not the answer for any set of serious players!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yes, only an idiot would play a maniac heads-up... [/ QUOTE ] I am not sure what you are saying. The live ones are not always maniacs. What is wrong with playing heads-up? [ QUOTE ] Die, will ya? [/ QUOTE ] You talkin to me? D. [/ QUOTE ] oops, i misread your post, thus the confusion...
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
