#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMG... poor play, huge pot
Limping is ok, 3-betting is not.
k |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMG... poor play, huge pot
Call the pf raise.
Check/raise the flop. Check/raise the turn since you fogot to raise the flop. I would probably call the river. I would consider both raising and folding though. At first I thought raising might be best but now I think I may just be being results oriented since you posted results against the constant advice of bisonbison. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMG... poor play, huge pot
I'm not convinced that my pf play was completely wrong. My analysis will be simplistic however:
There are 6 people total, and I figured everyone would call if I reraised. There are 8.5 SB already, and if everyone calls a reraise by me then there will be 18.5 SB (if the raiser doesn't cap), 2 SB of which I've just put in. So I'm contributing 11%. Assume my sixes will win everytime I hit a set. That's roughly 12% of the time. So my equity to the pot is 12%. It's probably even higher because I'm almost certainly getting to the turn and the turn is another chance at a set. So there is a pot equity edge of at least 1%. Reraising if everyone will call and nobody caps is greater EV than calling. That's how I think it goes, but I'm unsure of how pot equity works. Maybe I'm contributing a massive 17% instead. The example in SSH doesn't make it entirely clear, but it uses a figure obtained like the latter. Of course, since someone folded it did become lesser EV, maybe negative. I guess I should have expected at least one person to fold. Calling was best. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMG... poor play, huge pot
I don't know where I got the idea that someone folded preflop. Anyway, I think I am contributing 17%. So I'd need 9 people there for a reraise to be correct, unless I'm misunderstanding pot equity.
|
|
|