Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-02-2004, 06:35 PM
The Armchair The Armchair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 251
Default Re: Logic Puzzle: \"Rock On\"

Edit: They're integers, and you want integer values, including 1. (For clarity's sake!)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-02-2004, 06:38 PM
jwvdcw jwvdcw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 182
Default Re: Logic Puzzle: \"Rock On\"

Think I got it:

<font color="white"> My thought process went something like this:

You need 3 smalls numbers which would enable you to get any smaller numbers. Then you'll need one big number. The 3 small numbers that seemed to work for everything(just used trial and error) are 9,3, and 1. With these numbers you can get anything from 1-13. Then I looked for a number halfway between 13 and 40 and got 27. Since I can get any number from 1-13, if I add in 27, I can get anything from 14(27-13) to 40(27+13). So the numbers are 9,3,1, and 27.</font>
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-02-2004, 06:42 PM
Oski Oski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 444
Default Re: Logic Puzzle: \"Rock On\"

looks good.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-02-2004, 06:43 PM
GuyOnTilt GuyOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Logic Puzzle: \"Rock On\"

The answer is <font color="white">1,3,9,27. Why these are the series of the first 4 non-fractional exponents of 3, I have no idea, but they work. Is there only one answer?

I started at the top. It seems easiest if all 4 rocks add up to exactly 40, and to get 39 one rock must be 1. 38 is just putting that 1 lb rock on the other side. 37 would have to be a 3 pounder. Then 36, 35, 34, 33, and 32 all take care of themselves with just moving those 2 rocks around. 31 isn't possible without a rock of a different value, so the 3rd rock is 9. And since they all have to add up to 40, the last is 27. I tried it and it worked. First try!!!</font>

GoT
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-02-2004, 06:45 PM
jwvdcw jwvdcw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 182
Default Re: Logic Puzzle: \"Rock On\"

[ QUOTE ]
The answer is 1,3,9,27. Why these are the series of the first 4 non-fractional exponents of 3, I have no idea, but they work. Is there only one answer?

I started at the top. It seems easiest if all 4 rocks add up to exactly 40, and to get 39 one rock must be 1. 38 is just putting that 1 lb rock on the other side. 37 would have to be a 3 pounder. Then 36, 35, 34, 33, and 32 all take care of themselves with just moving those 2 rocks around. 31 isn't possible without a rock of a different value, so the 3rd rock is 9. And since they all have to add up to 40, the last is 27. I tried it and it worked. First try!!!

GoT

[/ QUOTE ]

seems so easy when you say it like this.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.