Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-02-2004, 10:09 AM
highlife highlife is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 294
Default Re: Money Laundering

[ QUOTE ]
People could do that at a B&M casino and heave less paper trail.

You and I sit at the craps table. We then go to the bathroom. I give you $4k worth of chips. We go back to the craps tables for a second. Guess I lost that money at the casino and you won! And whaddya know, we did it all in cash too, so it can go even less detected!

[/ QUOTE ]

umm what kind of drug dealer launders 4k? thats pocket change. for the type of money they are looking to clean, there is no way they could do it at a B&M casino without attracting ALOT of attention.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-02-2004, 10:13 AM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: Money Laundering

Really. Give me an example of the IRS having authority over foreign companies.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-02-2004, 10:28 AM
moondogg moondogg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 145
Default Re: Money Laundering

The US claims jurisdiction over a lot of things. For example, according the Monroe Doctrine, the US claimed to have authority over pretty much the entire western hemisphere.

The issue becomes enforcebility (sp?). In reality, the US could enfore pretty much whatever they want on whoever they want, but in many cases it would require an act of war (e.g. Noriega, Afgantistan, Iraq). Unless the US is planning to invade the host country where the "criminal" actions are taking place, they pretty much have to rely on the government of the host nation to enforce the "law" or extridite the offending parties. For example, when Canadians were bootlegging booze into the US during prohibition, Canada helped the US attempts to stop it, despite booze being perfectly legal in Canada.

However, I don't think the US will get a whole lot of cooperation from foreign countries when it gambling/poker/etc. Countries like Costa Rica thrive on providing internet gambling to the US, so they are not going to clamp down on it without some serious pressure. Quite frankly, in looking at the backlash over the US presense in Iraq, it would be a tough sell to say we need to pursue either sanctions or military action against countries like Costa Rica because of a little gambling. Too many people don't see gambling as a threat to our country at all, and the people who considerate a problem don't consider it a big enough problem for the US to start flexing international muscle again.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-02-2004, 10:28 AM
Blake Lovely Blake Lovely is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 81
Default Re: Money Laundering

I meant to type aren't. my fault.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-02-2004, 11:37 AM
Alobar Alobar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 795
Default Re: Money Laundering

you forgot to mention his legs are shaved too [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-02-2004, 01:18 PM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 91
Default Re: Money Laundering

[ QUOTE ]
What exactly do you mean?

Once the credit card is charged, the company can somehow withdraw payment?

As long as the poker site doesnt give out chips until the transaction clears then they cant be forced to return funds that have already been recieved.

Nor do i think the credit card company would refuse payment in the event of fraudulent use (not real sure, any expert advise would help there)

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure if you know this. Most US banks will not let you use your credit card. Partly because of the govt but mostly because of the huge costs they had in people losing and claiming they never made the purchase, people chipdumping and charging back, people using stolen credit cards and dumping and the cost of lawsuits several issuers had with people suing CC companies for their losses because they alleged the CC companies were participating in an illegal act, obviously a cop out excuse.

In the US you have 60 days to dispute a charge, ANY CHARGE. Online transactions are especially vulnerable. They most often do not have signature faxed and obviously do not have an imprint of the card or a swipe. These transactions can be disputed and won in most cases, especially since online gambling is not a product that could be signed for upon delivery like an Ebay purchase. If you dispute the charge and win the online casino/pokerroom/whoever is out of the money in their merchant account. If this money is already withdrawn/lost like im sure it is in almost any case they have no way to recoup the losses.

Casinos keep negative databases so you may get away with this once but will have a hard time finding anyone out there that will want your business after you've done this. I didnt post this to give anyone an idea on how to scam, was just to answer a question. This is why many casinos ask for these annoying ID fax ins.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-02-2004, 01:51 PM
Blake Lovely Blake Lovely is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 81
Default Re: Money Laundering

Good post. thanks for some of the insights.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.