#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I wouldn't go that far. [/ QUOTE ] which part do u object to? [/ QUOTE ] Both if they're related to mike. Jury still out on party. J |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
[ QUOTE ]
Enjoy! [/ QUOTE ] Is that a manatee in your avatar? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
[ QUOTE ]
I start to understand why Party hasn't been on this board for so long. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, when someone pisses down your back and tells you to enjoy the rain, they usually don't get a good reception here. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
you guys are missing out on his generosity. He's allowing us to NAME THE TABLES!! that's freakin amazing.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
Dude, there ar so many reasons why he may have just posted that, that do not involve him being mean or nasty. He may post a menaingful update soon. Perhaps he's not sitting in front of his comupter right now, maybe he posted it and left not realizing how the zoo would react.
You should calm down. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
actualy I just checked who's online and he was reading this thread.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
This is so [censored] ridiculous what they're doing. They honestly think we are idiots. Oh, the skins have seperate tables now, but oh well we can name the tables, yay for Party Poker.
[censored] that. We aren't morons, don't treat us like we are. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley/PartyPoker.com scumbag with no integrity
With threads like this I can see why people love "the zoo" so much.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Mike O\'Malley please read
Ok, well then, Mr. O'Malley, I think you owe us a little bit of an explanation. I dont believe your post was intended to be malicious, but please explain what is going on, and if you are not at liberty to disclose details at this time, at least say that.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mike O\'Malley please read
|
|
|