#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $5/10 stud high hand
[ QUOTE ]
I'd check-fold fifth street myself, Andy. Your going to have a hard time convincing anyone you even have queens seeing how you didnt complete on third. I would say you can expect to be behind here on fifth more than 95% of the time, perhaps far behind (as the check-raise indicates). I would be begging for a free card here. You have a queen and an eight out, plus two opponents showing pretty boards. I doubt anyone is being scared off here on fifth. But hell, you're a God and I'm just a man, so take my two cents with a grain of salt. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Mike Emery [/ QUOTE ] Two Queens were gone, which makes it pretty tough. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $5/10 stud high hand
I like checking on fifth street and calling and taking one off. I think the rest of the hand was fine.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $5/10 stud high hand
Limp reraise 3rd, fold fifth. Nice effort though. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Results here
I'm usually doing other things while I play on-line, so I frequently don't see the cards that are folded before the action gets to me on third street. I'm pretty sure I didn't know that a Queen was out on third. An option I would like to see available is to be able to have the table pop to the front when the hand is dealt, rather than when the action is on you, so that your eBay activity or whatever doesn't interfere with your seeing the folded cards.
On fourth, I had some vague idea about betting into the original raiser so that he might raise and thin the field. Why, I don't know. The rest of the hand was just silly. I agree with the panel that I would have done well to check and fold on fifth, and that calling the check-raise was somewhat foolhardy. The other guy started with (T7)9r and won with a pair of Tens. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $5/10 stud high hand
I like the bet out on 4th, but I'd fold to the c/r on 5th.
|
|
|