|
|
|
|
#1
08-30-2005, 12:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ferguson vs. Prahlad
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The reason he didn't move all in is because that's the worst possible thing he could do. I don't know the Ted Forrest hand you're talking about but just judging by the holdings and the board that is not even close to the same thing. [/ QUOTE ]it really wasnt, if he pushes he might get a K to fold and avoid a chop [/ QUOTE ] First, I really doubt that, although I could be talking out of my ass. Second of all, what king do you put Ferguson on after the previous action? 
|
|
#2
08-30-2005, 12:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ferguson vs. Prahlad
Maybe your right, but I think if the stack sizes were right (which I dont know if they were) a push may not be that bad
|
|
#3
08-30-2005, 03:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ferguson vs. Prahlad
[ QUOTE ]
it really wasnt, if he pushes he might get a K to fold and avoid a chop [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Maybe your right, but I think if the stack sizes were right (which I dont know if they were) a push may not be that bad [/ QUOTE ] the thing is that ferguson will only call a push with either an ace or a king. Stacks definitely weren't deep enough for him to fold a king. So by pushing prahlad achieves at best a split. So he's either splitting or losing. This makes the all-in raise -EV.
|
|
#4
08-30-2005, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ferguson vs. Prahlad
think of it this way salva, what does raising do for you in both of those hands?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
