|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
Pokertracker for Stud & Stud Hi/Lo. And you'd probably make a ton if you ever decided to charge
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
[ QUOTE ]
Pokertracker for Stud & Stud Hi/Lo. And you'd probably make a ton if you ever decided to charge [/ QUOTE ] i sent pat a pm about what his thoughts were on if a draw tracker was possible and if he had thought about it. his reply was that it was def possible, but he had little intention of doing it in the near future. and that stud might be done next, depending on how he felt. edit: i'm an [censored], how did i forget to say what i wanted. a draw tracker. i've been working on getting something that pulls stats from UB tripple draw hand histories. it's not done, there's a bunch of bugs that i still don't know the cause of. and the end product isn't gonna be something as nice as pt, but it will work for me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
Some sort of competition for PartyMine. Just about anything would be better than the current product.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
[ QUOTE ]
Some sort of competition for PartyMine. Just about anything would be better than the current product. [/ QUOTE ]This is a very, very good idea. And I already paid for PartyMine. -Sam |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
[ QUOTE ]
Some sort of competition for PartyMine. Just about anything would be better than the current product. [/ QUOTE ] definately, an alternative to partymine would be amazing and wildly popular! i can't frickin beleive that you have to pay more for partymine that PAHUD! now that is ridiculous. since starpsy is dead, a working datamine program for pokerstars would be nifty as well. do both and you would be legend not to mention garner a large user base given party and pokerstars are the two biggest sites. cheers, sean |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
'a working datamine program for pokerstars would be nifty as well'
and against the TOS and get any user banned.. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
[ QUOTE ]
definately, an alternative to partymine would be amazing and wildly popular! [/ QUOTE ] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
This doesn't entirely fit the bill because as far as I know it doesn't exist, but something that could analyse your past hands in a "sklansky bucks" sort of way would be interesting. It would show at what point you were calling with/without the right odds--basically if you really are getting your money in with the best of it.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
[ QUOTE ]
something that could analyse your past hands in a "sklansky bucks" sort of way would be interesting. It would show at what point you were calling with/without the right odds--basically if you really are getting your money in with the best of it. [/ QUOTE ]I can't really imagine this will be a useful tool. It sounds like it would only be used for results-oriented, whiny analysis. I'm not trying to be mean, but I don't need a tool that says "If you somehow knew Villian had KdJc, you should have raised on the flop but folded on the turn." -Sam |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If you could have any tool for free, what would it be?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] something that could analyse your past hands in a "sklansky bucks" sort of way would be interesting. It would show at what point you were calling with/without the right odds--basically if you really are getting your money in with the best of it. [/ QUOTE ]I can't really imagine this will be a useful tool. It sounds like it would only be used for results-oriented, whiny analysis. I'm not trying to be mean, but I don't need a tool that says "If you somehow knew Villian had KdJc, you should have raised on the flop but folded on the turn." -Sam [/ QUOTE ] This looks useful to me and seems to be the exact opposite of results oriented thinking - maybe you read it wrong? It would come back and say "On hand xyz you called with a gutshot straight on the flop with only 5:1 odds" Not sure if it would get a lot of use as some of the other suggestions though since calculating pot odds in your head as you are playing is fairly easy. Anyways, just wanted to defend the original idea because I don't think it was a bad one and was probably misread. rvg |
|
|