|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: . | |||
| Tha Salt Cracka |
   
|
45 | 41.28% |
| MajorKong |
  
|
64 | 58.72% |
| Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
06-29-2005, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some postflop weakness at the 50+5\'s
[ QUOTE ]
I push PF, but as a general rule, I don't push flops like this into 2 people without a read. I may just bet 300 and then call a raise - it looks scarier. [/ QUOTE ] Oh, I didn't realize there were two callers. I thought he was heads-up postflop. Nevermind my answer. 
|
|
#13
06-29-2005, 08:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Some postflop weakness at the 50+5\'s
[ QUOTE ]
I push PF [/ QUOTE ] Why push with a T700 stack when the blinds are that small?
|
|
#15
06-29-2005, 08:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Some postflop weakness at the 50+5\'s
[ QUOTE ]
Also, get away from that 125 raise. What is that? Make it 150. [/ QUOTE ] It's raising 2,5BB. It's pretty standard, I believe. A matter of taste or something like that.
|
|
#16
06-29-2005, 09:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Some postflop weakness at the 50+5\'s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also, get away from that 125 raise. What is that? Make it 150. [/ QUOTE ] It's raising 2,5BB. It's pretty standard, I believe. A matter of taste or something like that. [/ QUOTE ] It entices too many calls at Level 3. I don't like it.
|
|
#17
06-29-2005, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Some postflop weakness at the 50+5\'s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's raising 2,5BB. It's pretty standard, I believe. A matter of taste or something like that. [/ QUOTE ] It entices too many calls at Level 3. I don't like it. [/ QUOTE ] I have to admit that I'm starting to not like it too. Just wanted to explain myself.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
