#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
[ QUOTE ]
Thats freaking weird. After I read that it had six I went back and closely examined it and still didn't see the OFs. [/ QUOTE ] me too. i needed the last bit of info. i'm ususally good at these, but this one got me. then i ran it by lorinda (math & logic geek) and she got 3 as well. that's why i posted it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
[ QUOTE ]
i counted all six... but then again i remember this little exercise from many years back. what do i win? [/ QUOTE ] the warm feeling that your long-term memory is still intact. enjoy it while it lasts. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
This test is flawed. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
I got 6 the first time, having never seen it before, and I'm dumb as a post. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
I only found 3. It's interesting how our brains filter out "unimportant data." Taking articles out of sentences (i.e. "the" and "a") makes the sentence just as understandable. I suppose that's why some languages don't have these types of words. Then again, other languages have long-ass words to compensate.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
I counted 5...missed the OF in the last line. I guess I'm almost a genius.
But I also have difficulty reading off a computer screen so I tend to read very slowly and deliberately. The Doc |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
wow. I got three...twice. I guess I am a dumba**.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
[ QUOTE ]
wow. I got three...twice. I guess I am a dumba**. [/ QUOTE ] 2x3=6=genius ? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
Four...I only sorta suck.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
[ QUOTE ]
I counted 5...missed the OF in the last line. I guess I'm almost a genius. [/ QUOTE ] I counted the exact same 5, twice in a row. I finally noticed the last OF going letter for letter. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: try this (OT)
I have seen this before so I got it right.
can I be a genius? |
|
|