My avatar didn't even last 24 hours

[citanul]

surely i'm not the only person who was sitting around thinking about what a 10 foot tall blue footed [censored] would like like, right?

c

[Slim Pickens]

[ QUOTE ]

Monstrous boobies are monstrously overrated.

Young cute chicks making out? Yeah...need some animation [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

<font color="white">...but maybe I just say that because I get to play with a big set any time I want.</font>

[sng-sam]

we have to keep this thread going I am shooting for "worst post with a fire thingy next to it" (there is an award for that right?)

Straight Flushes,

SAM

PS you should see the link I sent citanul

[Big Limpin']

[ QUOTE ]
...keep this thread going..."worst post with a fire thingy next to it"


[/ QUOTE ]

Can do. I caught the avatar. It was splendid. give out the link so i/we can stare hypnotically at the (hopefully) larger version.

now, about:
[ QUOTE ]
Monstrous boobies are monstrously overrated.

[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
see, heres the thing. theres a bigger=better rule that hold only within boundarys. You have to go apples vs apples. Theres monsterous, on a "plump" woman, wheres its just droop/sag, and extra skin and all smooshy fat. thats no good. i dont like those, not much.
But theres sort of "supercritical" breasts. where they retain the integrity of the nice smaller ones, but somehow manage to pull of being really big, with the girl still having, like, shes low BMI. Firm. Goot.
So my thinking, you cant overrate monsterous breasts if they are BIG and NICE. its simply the superlative of any description you give. where i grant leeway is the fatty big, could be called overrated, but i mean, whos been rating those so high to begin with? Not me!

Anyways, theres my mini-rant Sam, anyone wanna take this ball and run with it?

BL' &lt;--all his porn is "naturals"

[bones]

[ QUOTE ]
BL' &lt;--all his porn is "naturals"

[/ QUOTE ]

You're really limiting yourself here.

[Big Limpin']

you haven't seen my stash [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[sng-sam]

[ QUOTE ]
see, heres the thing. theres a bigger=better rule that hold only within boundarys. You have to go apples vs apples. Theres monsterous, on a "plump" woman, wheres its just droop/sag, and extra skin and all smooshy fat. thats no good. i dont like those, not much.
But theres sort of "supercritical" breasts. where they retain the integrity of the nice smaller ones, but somehow manage to pull of being really big, with the girl still having, like, shes low BMI. Firm. Goot.
So my thinking, you cant overrate monsterous breasts if they are BIG and NICE. its simply the superlative of any description you give. where i grant leeway is the fatty big, could be called overrated, but i mean, whos been rating those so high to begin with? Not me!


[/ QUOTE ]

I see we have a connoisseur

NH sir


Straight Flushes,

SAM

PS looking for the link.

[ QUOTE ]

Can do. I caught the avatar. It was splendid.

[/ QUOTE ]

speaking of splendid avatars, that may be the most brilliant goal i've ever seen...

[sng-sam]

cmon boys we have to get this thread over the threashold for the fire thingy .I've searched for the old avatar but I can't find it again. it was a big boobed woman in a plaid bra drinking water and her boobs got bigger when she drank. (like a camel!) someone find it. Google hates me


Straight Flushes,

SAM

PS remember I want to have the most useless thread to ever get a campfire thingy...this is my legacy

[microbet]

Sounds like you are going to need the link if you want any hope of getting the flame.

Your current avatar is hot enough that, well, no offense, but I don't always read your posts after opening them.