|
View Poll Results: Nutso table, reaction? | |||
Find another table, I don't like what this does to my variance. | 0 | 0% | |
Stay, but tighten up. They are giving away money. | 0 | 0% | |
Stay and loosen up a little, you'll outplay them postflop. | 0 | 0% | |
Just continue with the same strategy you have had before. Ignore the raises because they are meaningless in regards to the opponent's hand strength. | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should Syntax Be Banned?
I thought syntax was already banned at 2+2 [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Oh, wait. That's in the books. Never mind. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should Syntax Be Banned?
C'mon Gabby, we couldn't ban syntax anymore than we could ban you. You both add color, flavor, and entertainment to the forums. At the risk of being flamed, I'll even suggest that you both add a uhm.. fresh perspective on things.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should Syntax Be Banned?
dear gabbyyyyy
definitly it should. We could do a re-start; start from scratch and talk and communicate like the first original caveman. Refinding our storage of current knowledge we could do an archiological dig and invent a new system with a perfect world. Thanks for such brillant food for thought. The only problem with this is that it would take a billion years and you won't be around to experience it..... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should Syntax Be Banned?
Is syntax still here? [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
|