Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-25-2005, 10:37 AM
iNsChris iNsChris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 163
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

[ QUOTE ]
Looks way overplayed to me.

I call the flop raise, and check/call to showdown.

I think anybody that advocate folding at any point in this hand is being very weak.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-25-2005, 10:49 AM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

I'm very curious what people put as his hand range here. I think that it is {dd, 98, A2, A7, AA-77, 22, TA-T2, J9, 68(?)} maybe there are a few more. Obviously some of these are more likely than others. Does anyone think that I have included hands which are obviously not in his hand range? Does anyone think I have left out any that are in his hands range? Does anyone think that 3-betting is not good against the hand range as I have defined it? How does the presence of the MP player affect things? Thanks for the help.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-25-2005, 10:50 AM
KingOtter KingOtter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 667
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

What's TWP mean?

I understand betting top pair against a really bad player, but you don't have much else to this hand. I think I want a better hand to take him to task.

KO
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-25-2005, 10:54 AM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

[ QUOTE ]
What's TWP mean?

[/ QUOTE ]
TheWorstPlayer. Sorry. It's just that I have been accused of being a maniac on here a few times before. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-25-2005, 11:01 AM
KingOtter KingOtter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 667
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm very curious what people put as his hand range here. I think that it is {dd, 98, A2, A7, AA-77, 22, TA-T2, J9, 68(?)} maybe there are a few more. Obviously some of these are more likely than others. Does anyone think that I have included hands which are obviously not in his hand range? Does anyone think I have left out any that are in his hands range? Does anyone think that 3-betting is not good against the hand range as I have defined it? How does the presence of the MP player affect things? Thanks for the help.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is hard, because we don't really have a read on him, and his donkitude. We have his stats, and he appears aggro, but we don't know when he was aggro... did he have something in his hand? Does he jam top-pair consistently? Does he slowplay big hands pre-flop? Does he know where the fold/call buttons are (I played against a LAA very recently where he raised every bet, and bet every time when checked to... every time... if this was HIM, I'd 3-bet)?

His flop raise seems to me to say 'I beat top-pair' ... or at the least 'My kicker beats your kicker'. I let him convince me and call down from there, or quite possibly drop the turn unimproved.

I don't think we have enough of a feeling for him in order to understand your play.

KO
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-25-2005, 11:43 AM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

That's fair. My general point, though, is that an unknown will raise a fairly wide range of hands on the flop and that against that range 3betting TP is good. Then when he caps, calling down is good. Do people disagree?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-25-2005, 11:50 AM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 365
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

[ QUOTE ]
I think that 3-betting the turn against an unknown with TP (even with no kicker) is not that bad, but I'm willing to be corrected.

[/ QUOTE ]

On the turn you had second pair. I know, you meant the flop.

So, on the flop. You've got a weak top pair, no kicker, and you're out of position against TWO PLAYERS, only one of whom you think will be crazygonuts with nothing. So, you need to isolate. So, go for the C/R, assuming the civilian will check behind you and Mr. Lag will bet. When you've got Villan isolated, call down UI.

That's the play I'd use if I were 100% convinced of a read on Villan, that he would be equally likely to bet and raise with 72o, AKs or AA...and I was smoking dope. You realize that he beats you with a Good Buddy, right? I think I check this flop and chuck it when he bets. I certainly check-n-chuck UI on the turn.

As for a hand range for your Villan, how can you put him on any range? Your own read is that he plays anything, and that's why we're talking about this; you haven't provided us with any further information as to how he plays postflop.

"[His raises] on the flop led me to believe that he had at least two cards."
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-25-2005, 11:52 AM
fluxrad fluxrad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Peruvian highlands.
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would have released it on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]
Three handed on the flop, you're folding top pair to a raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

With a 3 kicker? Yes. I'm folding it. Any ten beats you, overcards have a clean 6 outs, and the pot is tiny. I'd let it go.

Then again, I suck at poker [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-25-2005, 12:10 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

[ QUOTE ]
On the turn you had second pair. I know, you meant the flop.


[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I meant flop, sorry.

[ QUOTE ]

So, on the flop. You've got a weak top pair, no kicker, and you're out of position against TWO PLAYERS, only one of whom you think will be crazygonuts with nothing. So, you need to isolate. So, go for the C/R, assuming the civilian will check behind you and Mr. Lag will bet. When you've got Villan isolated, call down UI.

[/ QUOTE ]
See, I don't really think he is LAG. I more think he is unknown/bad/loose-ish/maybe aggro. But I thought that MP was going to raise a hand that beats me so I figured him for a mid pair/bottom pair/an overcard/a draw. Then when the bad guy raises I figured I had too much hand to fold and if I called then MP would be getting a good price on a call so I raised. When bad player capped, that slowed me down so I just called down.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-25-2005, 12:15 PM
DeathDonkey DeathDonkey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 83
Default Re: Patented TWP over-aggro donkitude?

I play it the same except I think you may be able to fold on the river. All you can beat is diamonds.

-DeathDonkey
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.