#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
I can't please everybody and opening every aspect of this to discussion is just going to lead to gridlock. Anything that is not truly troubling (i.e. trust issues/logistics) is non-negotiable. Take it or leave it. If the half a buyin return for 9-16 bothers you enough to drop out, PM me. But I figure that winning a round should at least get you something but that there should be enough left to make the top 4 spots pretty enticing.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
[ QUOTE ]
I can't please everybody and opening every aspect of this to discussion is just going to lead to gridlock. Anything that is not truly troubling (i.e. trust issues/logistics) is non-negotiable. Take it or leave it. If the half a buyin return for 9-16 bothers you enough to drop out, PM me. But I figure that winning a round should at least get you something but that there should be enough left to make the top 4 spots pretty enticing. [/ QUOTE ] haha dont get me wrong im still playing, its just like.. i duno i always get pissed when i end up getting half back. like in the damned step 4 highers. they pay out like 5 spots so ppl that work their way up have a chance. iiiiim just nitpickin tell me where to ship my money. holla |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
Better payout? :
32-17: 0 16-9: 0 8-5: 2500 4-3: 6000 2: 10000 1: 16000 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
definitely.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
i wrote up a pretty good payout structure in the last thread.
i think that there should be a bronze medal match. i think that there won't be anyone who minds not gettin back 1/2 entry |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
I think people might be more hesitant to play if they'd have to win 2 rounds just to make 1K and might care less about more money for top 2 since it's somewhat of a longshot to get there. I guess I'd consider this pay-out structure. What do other players who will be involved think and how strong are their preferences?
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
yeti's payout structure is brilliant. only i would have 3rd and 4th play a match for a higher payout than the other one.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
i like this a lot yeti.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
Perfect is the enemy of good.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 HU NL TOURNEY TAKE 2...LET\'S DO THIS
[ QUOTE ]
yeti's payout structure is brilliant. only i would have 3rd and 4th play a match for a higher payout than the other one. [/ QUOTE ] We'll do Yeti's payout then. As for 3rd and 4th, let's keep it as Yeti has it. I say that if 3rd and 4th agree to a division of the $12K based on a match between them, they can arrange one after both of them announce on 2+2 that this is agreed upon (so that the money is distributed correctly). |
|
|