![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which state? | |||
Idaho |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
28 | 8.21% |
West Virginia |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
42 | 12.32% |
Wisconsin |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 1.76% |
Utah |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 6.74% |
Arkansas |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 7.92% |
Ohio |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 2.05% |
Wyoming |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 11.44% |
Iowa |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 4.40% |
Alaska |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 2.05% |
Nebraska |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 3.81% |
North Dakota |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
74 | 21.70% |
South Dakota |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 6.16% |
Montana |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 5.28% |
Oregon |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 2.35% |
Washington |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 3.81% |
Voters: 341. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Voted for Mike, but I wish I had voted for Kanter.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Black
Matusow Barch |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
btw who voted for lazar [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
btw who voted for lazar [/ QUOTE ] He probably logged on and voted for himself. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] black is close. Don't forget, he was at the final table when Stu Ungar won. But then again, i've never seen any of these guys play more than a handful of...hands. [/ QUOTE ] Black seemed like he was playing good but I can't give him too much credit after his atrocious table talk in the hand where he had a set against Kanter. [/ QUOTE ] from the cardplayer broadcast, black played a really excellent the whole way. however, i agree that his table talk in that hand was awful. just stfu and let kanter pay you off. [/ QUOTE ] From the information on the hands that you gleaned listening to the broadcast, or from Helmuth constantly saying he was the best player? The K-J all-in play over Barch's raise (the day before the FT) was pretty questionable too, IMO. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matusow is clearly the best, and he might have won it if he hadn't lost the KK vs. AA hand. It's fortunate he didn't, since everyone at the 2/4 tables would try to act like him.
Hachem is the most underrated. I don't know why 3 people have voted for Dannenman. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Matusow is clearly the best, and he might have won it if he hadn't lost the KK vs. AA hand. It's fortunate he didn't, since everyone at the 2/4 tables would try to act like him. Hachem is the most underrated. I don't know why 3 people have voted for Dannenman. [/ QUOTE ] That board should show 100% Matusow, no doubt about that he was the most talented player on that table. Imo after that is goes like this: 1. Matusow 2-3. Hachem and Black 4. Barch |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matusow (easily)
Black Barch Hachem Bergdorf (The guy no one noticed who was there) Dannemon Kondracki Lazar Kanter I think this is pretter accurate. I really didn't see enough of Kondracki to judge his play, He didn't look bad, playing as the short-stack at the final table though. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Matusow, not even close. [/ QUOTE ] Ya, matusow is famous. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kanter got votes. LMAO
|
![]() |
|
|