![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
"in general" statements are good for rolled hands, aces, and maybe Ks. Most everything else is extremely relative/multifactorial. [/ QUOTE ] Very true. I just mentioned them because I think alot of old LHE players overvalue "high bags" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Very true. I just mentioned them because I think alot of old LHE players overvalue "high bags" [/ QUOTE ] Ah hah - my HE ignorance rears its ugly head in the stud forum [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're just starting with stud, then start with Roy West. Sklansky & Malmuth's would get you to the next level. Other helpful tomes from Caro and Karpinsky.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Karpinsky. [/ QUOTE ] Who? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Karpinsky. [/ QUOTE ] Who? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Beats me. How seriously are you going to take a guy who uses words like "tomes"? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have studied poker at all, there is no reason to bother with Adams, West, Adam West, Kammen, Ken Warren, whatever. Just get 7CS4AP.
I've read about half of the Adams book, and I'm not impressed. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll take KQJ every hand.
|
![]() |
|
|