#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Folding a flush when board pairs on river
[ QUOTE ]
This is very read dependent [/ QUOTE ] This is not all that read-dependant. Given the way this hand played out, Hero should call the river. SpaceAce |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Folding a flush when board pairs on river
Why not bet/fold the river? It seems like a good place for a block/value bet.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Folding a flush when board pairs on river
A lot of people are saying block bet.
I hate this idea at times. First of all, he may min. raise me if he has a hand. Even if you're "blocking" the river, it's pretty tough to fold with those odds. As well, blocking bets by their nature look just weak. I really don't think I'm ahead of a whole lot here and I'm surprised more people don't agree. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Folding a flush when board pairs on river
By checking to him on the river, the villain can bet a wide variety of hands. However, if you bet half the pot and he reraises you, you can fold the hand b/c in that case you are beat. The way it played out, I think you have to call river bet.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 Folding a flush when board pairs on river
Is the Villain really going to bet a wide variety of hands on *this* board? Only if he's crazy...
Ryan |
|
|