|
|
|
|
#1
12-15-2005, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
i dont know the previous action, but this isnt incredibly out of line.
rj [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] no, he's saying that he did this time. perhaps he had a reason to???? [/ QUOTE ] That top quote does not = he did this time. He's saying its not an incredible call given the action, which it is. 
|
|
#2
12-15-2005, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
You're forgetting that this was also a great play on Antonius' part. He read Cassidy for not hitting the board. Unfortunately, Cassidy made the same read on Antonius, and ended up calling with a higher kicker.
|
|
#3
12-15-2005, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
Cassidy isn't insane. Only insanely good.
|
|
#4
12-15-2005, 02:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
what made hand checks that scary a board on the river?
|
|
#5
12-15-2005, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
[ QUOTE ]
what made hand checks that scary a board on the river? [/ QUOTE ] OP got the board wrong, it wasn't as scary as that. See El D's post.
|
|
#6
12-15-2005, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what made hand checks that scary a board on the river? [/ QUOTE ] OP got the board wrong, it wasn't as scary as that. See El D's post. [/ QUOTE ] THen what the hell was this based on?? I'm sorry for getting aggravated by my own posting, but was that quote just an example of just following highly credited posters and discarding others? I have a major problem with this forum just being a group of yes men and not having any opinions of their own. I mean, look at the quote. He immediately discounts my statement and then follows El Diablos. Mainevent, If you were there, or have a better source, please discount my attack and i apoligize in advance. if you have a defense, please state it or I will have to look at your future posts in a different light.
|
|
#7
12-15-2005, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] what made hand checks that scary a board on the river? [/ QUOTE ] OP got the board wrong, it wasn't as scary as that. See El D's post. [/ QUOTE ] THen what the hell was this based on?? I'm sorry for getting aggravated by my own posting, but was that quote just an example of just following highly credited posters and discarding others? I have a major problem with this forum just being a group of yes men and not having any opinions of their own. I mean, look at the quote. He immediately discounts my statement and then follows El Diablos. Mainevent, If you were there, or have a better source, please discount my attack and i apoligize in advance. if you have a defense, please state it or I will have to look at your future posts in a different light. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not so much agreeing with Diablo as I am disagreeing with you. You had an 8 on the board, which no update site had and no one else who posted the hand on 2+2 had. I assumed it was a typo on your part, since I can't think of any source you could have gotten it from. BTW, I posted the hand with the same description in the GIGABET thread before Diablo or anyone else on 2+2 posted the hand at all, so I don't know how I'm "following" anyone.
|
|
#9
12-15-2005, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
Your board has to be wrong because if it weren't then the pot would have been split, which it wasn't.
A7 and A3 both have AQJ98 on your board.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
