|
|
#11
10-20-2005, 01:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing Pokerstars vs playing UB with rakeback
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm mostly a ring game player, so obviously rake effects me. I don't believe pstars offers any rakeback program but I know ub does. Should I just transfer my money to UB and get the rakeback program or does PStars have enough going for it that I should stick with Stars Also, does the rakeback program in any site give you rakeback for tournament fees? Or is it strictly for ring games. [/ QUOTE ] The downside of UB is that you can only play three tables at once. The upside is that bonuses don't impact your MGR so your rakeback won't go down when you add a bonus. The downside of the upside is that the bonuses suck. [/ QUOTE ] UB reduces the amount an affiliate gets if the player has a bonus pending. I see the reports. UB rocks all around! 
|
|
#12
10-20-2005, 03:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Playing Pokerstars vs playing UB with rakeback
[ QUOTE ]
does PStars have enough going for it that I should stick with Stars [/ QUOTE ] what does stars have going for them for a .5/1 player?
|
|
#13
10-20-2005, 12:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Playing Pokerstars vs playing UB with rakeback
I have found that that the games on PS are a lot softer than at UB. Other than that: NOTHING. Bonuses are next-to-impossible to clear at .5/1 at Stars. Then again, UB bonuses are hard to clear at all levels. Uhhh, maybe you should try a different poker site?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
