What do you think about this semibluff?

[James282]

NH as usual. These moves will work better against players at higher limits on tighter sites, seems like that would favor you. Ever though about checking out UB?
-James

[KaneKungFu123]

[ QUOTE ]
Villain was probably a recreational player.

[/ QUOTE ]

rofl

[HoldEmKillah]

[ QUOTE ]
why are all your posted hands weird semi-bluff/full bluffs that are called

[/ QUOTE ]

It seems as though you bluff way way too much which is perhaps why you are getting called by 'mediocre' hands so often. This one, like some others you posted, were played poorly. You are tying to represent what? A set? 2 pair(K5,75,K7,KJ...yeah right)? There is no way your line is convincing. I will call this with tp/tk against a player who likes to BHAO.

Fold preflop, stop bluffing and start posting better hands. I know you can do better than this on the table as well as in this forum.

[durrrr]

vn post holdem. Hope r3 follows ur advice.

Your move on the turn screams draw...not sure if I'd play it this way had I had set/2pair.....plus if he has a set...you only have 10 outs....if he has 2pair then u have 10-12 outs...and 10-12 outs vs other made hands...he had a tough call...but if you're an aggressive player...he was correct to call....if he had seen you push with draws hard like this before....he had every reason to call...

[ QUOTE ]
Stop [censored] posting.

[/ QUOTE ]

so i tell the MTT forum to [censored] themselves and a [censored] mod tells somebody to "stop [censored] posting" and I'm the one that's banned? Please explain, and I'm serious. At the very least this prick should not be a mod. Gee why do I have a feeling this post will be deleted by mods.

[Ulysses]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Stop [censored] posting.

[/ QUOTE ]

so i tell the MTT forum to [censored] themselves and a [censored] mod tells somebody to "stop [censored] posting" and I'm the one that's banned? Please explain, and I'm serious. At the very least this prick should not be a mod. Gee why do I have a feeling this post will be deleted by mods.

[/ QUOTE ]

link to MTT thread pls, sounds like good stuff. thx!

sorry Ul it was deleted.

[punter11235]

[ QUOTE ]
p.270 The Theory of Poker by David Sklansky :
Type of mistake: 1.Bluff too much; Best strategy : induce a bluff then call

[/ QUOTE ]

[r3vbr]

Okay here's the deal.. this post was actually an experiment of mine. I wanted to see if your replies to my topics were biased due to all these people flaming me.

What I realise is that most of the time, people don't even read my posts, they just see my nickname and reply a wise-ass one-liner sarcastic remark, just to make me look stupid. Sure some of the stuff I've posted on the past is really not educative "hand analysis" material, but that's does't people the right to flame. Just ignore the stuff if it's that bad.

Okay so I inverted the names on the hand history, so the HERO on this hand is actually my oponent and I'm villain. Also the guy I was playing against is a very respected well-known player here, and I'd bet if he posted the same hand he'd get much more sympathy. I picked this exact hand cause he played similar to how I would have played. I don't see any problem with this semibluff push, but of course it's not usual for someone to slowplay TPTK the way I did in that hand (I was planning to reraise allin turn, as this guy was really pushing everyone at the table around, betting draws oop etc), so usually his bet would work, pushing out of the pot some weak pair or draw.

People saying I played the hand horribly wouldn't say the same if the true "Hero" of this hand posted.

Also nice to see some good replies from Holdemkilla, James, etc, people actually trying to help.

Oh and screw you guys who respond to every thread you dislike by making a one-line remark wich usually tries to be funny and at the same time mocking the original poster every time. That's just like being an [censored].