|
|
|
|
#1
09-18-2005, 01:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
[ QUOTE ]
Meh. I've been doing way too much math on these boards today, so I'm not gonna attempt to prove/disprove what you just said. Maybe you're right; I'm just under the assumption that sample sizes are almost always too small [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. I do know that after ~150 games my ROI was like 15%; so that suggests that there's still significant variance at this scale. [/ QUOTE ] How does this suggest significant variance? 
|
|
#2
09-18-2005, 01:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
[ QUOTE ]
How does this suggest significant variance? [/ QUOTE ] Well in the first 150 he had a 15% ROI, and in the 2nd 150 he had a 45% ROI, thats a pretty big change?
|
|
#3
09-18-2005, 01:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Meh. I've been doing way too much math on these boards today, so I'm not gonna attempt to prove/disprove what you just said. Maybe you're right; I'm just under the assumption that sample sizes are almost always too small [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. I do know that after ~150 games my ROI was like 15%; so that suggests that there's sti ll significant variance at this scale. [/ QUOTE ] How does this suggest significant variance? [/ QUOTE ] My ROI for first 150 was ~15%. My ROI then was ~45% over the next 150. That's variance.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
