Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2005, 11:10 AM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

As usual, this can be answered with math (and subsequently through $EV analysis). Furthermore, once you consider that he has 5 BBs preflop, and that he is the short stack, you'll realize his range here is enormous. I am absolutely certain JJ will fair very well here against his range. In fact, I think it correct for him to be pushing top 50% of hands at least. I would think that the 4th best starting hand would fair well against that range.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2005, 11:12 AM
GtrHtr GtrHtr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 350
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

Ok, so I picked a poor hand to post for this "discussion."

I am really curious what your calling ranges are in this situation.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2005, 11:18 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

I think this is where SNG Powertools comes in handy.

If he pushes: 22+,A2+,K2+,Q2s+,Q6o+,J7s+,J9o+,T8s+,98s (pretty wide range, but not unrealistic), you can call: 44+,A7o+,A2s+,KTo+,K9s+ (19%).

If he pushes: 22+,A2s+,A3o+,KTs+,KJo+,QJs you can call: 66+,AT+ (9%). I doubt he'll be much tighter, and if he is you can only call with premium hands.

So, it depends on your read.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2005, 12:06 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, so I picked a poor hand to post for this "discussion."

I am really curious what your calling ranges are in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

My calling range here would be:

Any pocker pair from 77.
A9+. 8 would be read dependant and 7- would be a toss.
K10+. 9 would be an easy toss.
Any broadway

Too tight/loose?

Oh and about the actual hand, I would insta call putting villain on:

22+,A2s+,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,A2o+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo. Now, that is a pretty tight range though and he can very well have an even worse hand. But against these hands:

563,348,016 games 1.218 secs 462,518,896 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 67.3191 % 66.91% 00.41% { JcJd }
Hand 2: 32.6809 % 32.27% 00.41% { 22+, A2s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A2o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }

Easy decision.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2005, 12:19 PM
pooh74 pooh74 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 316
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, so I picked a poor hand to post for this "discussion."

I am really curious what your calling ranges are in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

My calling range here would be:

Any pocker pair from 77.
A9+. 8 would be read dependant and 7- would be a toss.
K10+. 9 would be an easy toss.
Any broadway

Too tight/loose?

Oh and about the actual hand, I would insta call putting villain on:

22+,A2s+,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,A2o+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo. Now, that is a pretty tight range though and he can very well have an even worse hand. But against these hands:

563,348,016 games 1.218 secs 462,518,896 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 67.3191 % 66.91% 00.41% { JcJd }
Hand 2: 32.6809 % 32.27% 00.41% { 22+, A2s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A2o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }

Easy decision.

[/ QUOTE ]

Man, I should tighten my pushing standards against you loosey callers...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2005, 12:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

The reason it's so loose is because I'm putting him on a steal so that justifies that range if you ask me. However, if I where in the game I'd probably have a good read on him which would either tighten up my range or making my posted range acceptable.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2005, 06:03 PM
Nick M Nick M is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 67.3191 % 66.91% 00.41% { JcJd }
Hand 2: 32.6809 % 32.27% 00.41% { 22+, A2s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A2o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }

[/ QUOTE ]

god that makes me so hot...excuse me i need to go to the bathroom
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-25-2005, 06:05 PM
Nick M Nick M is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

i think 99 is a better one to ask.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2005, 07:47 PM
GtrHtr GtrHtr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 350
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

[ QUOTE ]
i think 99 is a better one to ask.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. I played this hand and then started thinking about calling standards. The hand was a no brainer but I honestly wanted to get a feel for posters calling standards.

I insta called in this case and then asked myself, with the stacks like this, how low would I go?

A much more interesting poster than me would've sub'ed 99 for the JJ and that actually crossed my mind - after the first 3 posters replied - which was too late. I've got another one tho...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-25-2005, 11:30 AM
pooh74 pooh74 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 316
Default Re: A discussion on calling standards

[ QUOTE ]
I play a fairly tight calling range when the pusher is not a shorty. What is your play here with 7.5 BB after posting?

***** Hand History for Game 2862701975 *****
200/400 Tourney Texas Hold'em Game Table (NL) (Tournament 16482688) - Mon Oct 24 20:51:51 EDT 2005
Table Table 35064 (Real Money) -- Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: michael (1970)
Seat 4: thenagain (1740)
Seat 7: SMU (1495)
Seat 9: Griper (1065)
Seat 10: Hero (1730)
Griper posts small blind (100)
Hero posts big blind (200)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ Jh, Js ]
michael folds.
thenagain folds.
SMU folds.
Griper raises (965) to 1065
Griper is all-In.
Hero?

What is your calling range in this situation? Example: AK+, TT+

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say that is about right...in the BB and depending on read maybe Aq+ 99+...I'd call with JJ here in BB all day.

Edit: yeah, if I have him as a "push almost any two" type character, I might widen my range even more...but not down to 66, and AT is pushing it for me considering the stacks.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.