Stars and higher NL sngs

[solody]

Is there a big difference between $27's and $60's, terp ?

I was 3 tabling the $27's and now just began to play $60's. The $27's are easily beatable but I had a bad streak at the beginning of the $60's, hopefully it is better since.

Also do you know a player named sverre on stars ? He claimed to be a swedish pro 3 tabling the $60's with a return of $35/tourney (58% roi).

[UMTerp]

[ QUOTE ]
Is there a big difference between $27's and $60's, terp ?

I was 3 tabling the $27's and now just began to play $60's. The $27's are easily beatable but I had a bad streak at the beginning of the $60's, hopefully it is better since.

Also do you know a player named sverre on stars ? He claimed to be a swedish pro 3 tabling the $60's with a return of $35/tourney (58% roi).

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, there's a difference there, but I don't see any reason why a studious player should have any difficulty beating the $60's with a bit of experience either. Anything higher is a different story.

Yes, I know who sverre is. He's a good player, and I run into him occasionally at the higher buy-in SNGs and MTTs. I still have a hard time believing that anybody could have that high an ROI at that level though. I think the max theoretical ROI for the $60 Turbos would be somewhere in the low to mid 30's. I'm right around 20 myself (sometimes a bit above, sometimes a bit below), but I play more than three tables.