Cold call/smoothbet

[newhizzle]

i think you might be splitting the pot here, KQs is likely, i dont think hed cold call and UTG 2+2er raise with QJs, and he might 3-bet AQs, 66 is a remote possibility

edit: maybe JTs, but i think hed fold that too

[cold_cash]

I think this has to be AQ(s) or QKs, (since we know he's 3-betting 99 for sure).

Any other facedard combos seem like a fold, and if he's playing a small pair he's raising to get the nits out.

(It could also be the Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] from the looks of it, but I'm still saying he folds that.)

[newhizzle]

so if i have this right, your play is -EV because you are adding to the rake, which i dont think is capped yet

[cold_cash]

[ QUOTE ]
so if i have this right, your play is -EV because you are adding to the rake, which i dont think is capped yet

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think the rake has much to do with it.

[hobbsmann]

I was SB in this hand and I swore Jason had a set and Harv had a decent Q. BTW, the game was serious, but Harv seemed to be playing slightly looser than what I assume his average game is so his cc hand range needs to be opened up.

[Bodhi]

In a seven handed game, don't we need expand our cold-calling list a bit? That makes a hand like QJs more likely, or even 66 (which is unlikely but possible).

[newhizzle]

in a 7 handed game isnt his cold-calling range becoming his 3-betting range?

[Bodhi]

[ QUOTE ]
his cc hand range needs to be opened up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ahh, just what I thinking. This is a 7-handed game after all. A set of sixes is something we've overlooked.

[Bodhi]

apparently not.

[davet]

Yes, I think so.

I am pretty sure that Harv plays more aggressively PF than I do, and I would have to re- raise the hands I said I would.