Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2005, 12:44 AM
fnurt fnurt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 292
Default Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?

[ QUOTE ]
This is a very quick fold, 90% due to position.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you play AQo on the button here? I would. I wouldn't love it but you can't always give the UTG raiser credit for AK, people open with a lot less.

The guy who said he'd rather have 22 than AQ probably had a valid point. In fact, 22 would be an easy call, if not for the fact that someone might raise behind you - but that's the problem with the original question, too. This situation comes up the time and I always dump AQo in EP to a normal raiser.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2005, 12:57 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?

Yes, why does it always have to be AQ or AJ in this spot. I hate those easy, yet painful, laydowns
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-27-2005, 01:36 AM
gobboboy gobboboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 297
Default Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?

I play suited one gappers sometimes in this spot. I'm sure as hell reraising AQo.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2005, 01:44 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?

I'll take the suited one gapper everytime over AQ here.
Although i probably wouldn't call with either because there are 7 players left to act.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2005, 10:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?

Auto-fold.

And yes, I'm weak tight.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.