#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is it smart???? why the heck
It is possible that he mixed up BB/hr with BB/100 (as I did) when originally reading your post. If you can beat each table for 2BB/100 given say 50 hands per hour, then yes it is possible.
Edit: Nevermind, I was the only one dumb enough to miss that. He explicitly stated in terms of BB/100. His sarcasm was simply due to the fact that you are way underbankrolled for 1/2, as you should have at least $600 for that (300BB) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is it smart???? why the heck
It's not that much of a stretch I guess. If you liberally assume 240 hands per hour that's about 1.7BB/100. Pretty impressive if you can sustain it.
Like I said, if you're really good enough and you know it, and you can risk the variance until the roll gets up there, go for it. Just be ready to jump back down if you take a big hit early. -Salty edit: hey! I was dumb enough too. A little credit please. And yes, realistically the roll is too low. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is it smart????
.50/1 -> 1/2 is a hard transition and you don't have the roll to 4-table 1/2. you might be ready though, so maybe mix in 1 table of 1/2, see how it goes.
gl, --oj. |
|
|