![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I really like this idea. I hope someone takes the initiative and gets it going. [/ QUOTE ] I'm trying to |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
If there's a 10/20 game with two people, explain to them you have a bet on your match and ask if they'd mind leaving so you can play. [/ QUOTE ] I doubt this would be an issue, but if the site finds out, I'm sure they'd get pissed since this circumvents the rake. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it looks to me like cryptologic has a decent number of low limit heads up NL tables so this might be a possibility. the ub play money tables always seem full whenever i have checked.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They would have to be rake free b/c it's disgusting what the rake does.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
They would have to be rake free b/c it's disgusting what the rake does. [/ QUOTE ] is the concern the actual $ cost of the match or the amount of play it takes out of the match? what do you think it would end up costing playing .25-.50? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hes not worried about the cost, hes worried about them taking chips off the table and screwing up the tourney
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
hes not worried about the cost, hes worried about them taking chips off the table and screwing up the tourney [/ QUOTE ] if this is the only problem we could just have the match use 320bb instead of 300 right? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] They would have to be rake free b/c it's disgusting what the rake does. [/ QUOTE ] is the concern the actual $ cost of the match or the amount of play it takes out of the match? what do you think it would end up costing playing .25-.50? [/ QUOTE ] maybe $10 tops, but that is 20bbs, which is significant. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is there still an additional reload for the final four?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
is there still an additional reload for the final four? [/ QUOTE ] No |
![]() |
|
|