|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?
[ QUOTE ]
This is a very quick fold, 90% due to position. [/ QUOTE ] Would you play AQo on the button here? I would. I wouldn't love it but you can't always give the UTG raiser credit for AK, people open with a lot less. The guy who said he'd rather have 22 than AQ probably had a valid point. In fact, 22 would be an easy call, if not for the fact that someone might raise behind you - but that's the problem with the original question, too. This situation comes up the time and I always dump AQo in EP to a normal raiser. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?
Yes, why does it always have to be AQ or AJ in this spot. I hate those easy, yet painful, laydowns
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?
I play suited one gappers sometimes in this spot. I'm sure as hell reraising AQo.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?
I'll take the suited one gapper everytime over AQ here.
Although i probably wouldn't call with either because there are 7 players left to act. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQ UTG+1 awful?
Auto-fold.
And yes, I'm weak tight. |
|
|