Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:08 PM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: sittin on my 6xbuy-in stack
Posts: 690
Default Re: should i just set him in?

[ QUOTE ]

i think you and everyone else - the difference is folding a low flush with 4 on the board. they'll pump it up, where a half-decent player knows where they stand.

[/ QUOTE ]

yea, im only talking about this hand, 4-flush boards are completely different. im just saying theres no point in "trying to fold better hands" here. im just wondering if worse hands would call a raise/push
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:18 PM
beavens beavens is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: should i just set him in?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

i think you and everyone else - the difference is folding a low flush with 4 on the board. they'll pump it up, where a half-decent player knows where they stand.

[/ QUOTE ]

yea, im only talking about this hand, 4-flush boards are completely different. im just saying theres no point in "trying to fold better hands" here. im just wondering if worse hands would call a raise/push

[/ QUOTE ]

i think the best line would be to call and cry if he caught his backdoor flush.

but ive got a feeling youre ahead against a set/2pr
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:21 PM
Bukem_ Bukem_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 240
Default Re: should i just set him in?

Bet as much as you think he will call. He probably folds to a push though.

Huge majority of the time this is a confused donkey making a blocking bet/bluff, only he isn't sure which one it is.

These guys are hard to bluff, and you have to valuebet everything possible vs their stupid donk bets.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:31 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: should i just set him in?

I hate raising this river. Only a better hand will call. He's given you a nice showdown price. Why not just take it? If he shows you just a ten with no clubs, he wouldn't have called your raise or push. If he has a weak flush, he would have. If he has 2-pair, he probably (not for sure) calls the push. But there are few hands that play this way in to 2-pair.

I'll just call.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:32 PM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: sittin on my 6xbuy-in stack
Posts: 690
Default Re: should i just set him in?

what about a mini-raise [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:38 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: should i just set him in?

[ QUOTE ]
what about a mini-raise

[/ QUOTE ]

From you?

I'm not sure about that; I don't think often about making a minraise. I can see the value in it here. It might encourage a very marginal hand to call in desperation.

But then again (and the main reason why I generally don't like minraises), a minraise exposes you to further action, which you usually won't want. The opponent will of course push a strong hand. But a short stack could also feel like he needs to swing his way away from the wall, and push any marginal hand.

A push from the opponent is a very likely response to your minraise, and when it happens, it sucks. Given that a minraise will never evoke a fold, sometimes will evoke a call, and often evoke a difficult push, I'll not minraise here.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:43 PM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: sittin on my 6xbuy-in stack
Posts: 690
Default Re: should i just set him in?

id love a push from a marginal hand

question is, how often is a push a hand that i beat, and how often is a push from hand that i lose to? if it's 50/50 then the mini-raise is good because there are times when he also makes that crying call
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:46 PM
Bukem_ Bukem_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 240
Default Re: should i just set him in?

[ QUOTE ]
But a short stack could also feel like he needs to swing his way away from the wall, and push any marginal hand.


[/ QUOTE ]

These guys call. He won't bluff re-raise. He has a flush if he pushes.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:46 PM
emil3000 emil3000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 100
Default Re: should i just set him in?

[ QUOTE ]
what about a mini-raise [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
I actually like a minraise here.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-14-2005, 01:57 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mayor of Simpleton
Posts: 403
Default Re: should i just set him in?

[ QUOTE ]
id love a push from a marginal hand

question is, how often is a push a hand that i beat, and how often is a push from hand that i lose to? if it's 50/50 then the mini-raise is good because there are times when he also makes that crying call

[/ QUOTE ]

After reading some of these postings I thinkI like the dreaded min raise here. I would think much worse hands will call and only a better hand would re-raise. It is diabolically brillant (unless of course, villain has the nut flush).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.