|
View Poll Results: My Best BB/100 for 1k Hands | |||
10.1 or higher | 53 | 81.54% | |
4.1 - 7.0 | 2 | 3.08% | |
7.1 - 10.0 | 9 | 13.85% | |
2.0 - 4.0 | 1 | 1.54% | |
0.1 - 1.9 | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
[ QUOTE ]
If you are too lazy or busy to make changes when an owner calls you to make them then you have no business being commissioner. [/ QUOTE ] I don't get paid to run the league...I don't get a free entry fee or extra juice on the payouts. My buddies wanted a league to be started, I have the most online savvy and know the most about football and so I have administered the league. I am not of the opinion that doing the work of other team owners is part of the job of the commissioner. It isn't that I'm too busy...and it's certainly not because I'm lazy (having a late sleeping schedule is not indicative of laziness). I run the draft, I've collected the money, I will payout the money, I have mediated any decisions that have required my attention, all with fairness and promptness...why does being commish put me on the hook for changing your lineup when you have not been responsible enough to properly manage your own team? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you are too lazy or busy to make changes when an owner calls you to make them then you have no business being commissioner. [/ QUOTE ] I don't get paid to run the league...I don't get a free entry fee or extra juice on the payouts. My buddies wanted a league to be started, I have the most online savvy and know the most about football and so I have administered the league. I am not of the opinion that doing the work of other team owners is part of the job of the commissioner. It isn't that I'm too busy...and it's certainly not because I'm lazy (having a late sleeping schedule is not indicative of laziness). I run the draft, I've collected the money, I will payout the money, I have mediated any decisions that have required my attention, all with fairness and promptness...why does being commish put me on the hook for changing your lineup when you have not been responsible enough to properly manage your own team? [/ QUOTE ] You'd better hope you don't have an internet outage 5 minutes before kickoff when you find out your star player's "gametime decision" just went the opposite way from what you expected... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
[ QUOTE ]
Look, if it's an online league, then it's a league that demands computer access. I am my league's commissioner, and if someone called me at 11:30AM on a Sunday to tell me their starting lineup changes, I'd: 1) Be pissed off because I do not wake up on Sunday UNTIL (or sometimes after) the games have started. 2) Tell them to go F themselves. If you don't care enough to plan further ahead than a half hour, you're a douchebag idiot who shouldn't expect the commissioner to do your work for you...and that kind of dedication is deserving of a loss. [/ QUOTE ] Wow this is just totally opposite of what a good commissioner is supposed to do. His job is to run the league, and part of that is to make sure that the owner's needs are met, so long as they are reasonable. It's reasonable for an owner to ask his commissioner to make a lineup change for him. It's unreasonable for an owner to ask his commissioner to choose his players for the upcoming week. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
Player B wins because Player A essentially had a freeroll in these 2 positions. If LJ Smith and Hines Ward had gone off he would have kept his fat mouth shut and been like, "whew! Good thing Larry the commissioner wasn't home or I'd be out of the playoffs!!" If Player A wins it's a travesty, unless the commissioner would have retroactively made the substitutions if it caused Player A to lose.
-James |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
[ QUOTE ]
Player B wins because Player A essentially had a freeroll in these 2 positions. If LJ Smith and Hines Ward had gone off he would have kept his fat mouth shut and been like, "whew! Good thing Larry the commissioner wasn't home or I'd be out of the playoffs!!" If Player A wins it's a travesty, unless the commissioner would have retroactively made the substitutions if it caused Player A to lose. -James [/ QUOTE ] Good point. Plus I have a hard time believing Player A couldn't find another computer with internet or call someone with internet. If it was a money league, I would find a way. Also, if the commish allows this, what do you say to Player C who says "I had that same problem three weeks ago - I didn't think calling the commish and leaving a message with lineup changes would be allowed." ScottieK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
11:30 EST?
If you guys are playing for money I would go with team B. Team A could of easily go to a local internet cafe and make changes.l |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
Its for $ but nothing major. Winner gets $150.
BTW I was team B and I'm pretty sure the commish is gonna side with A. It looks like people are split 50-50 so its close enough that I'm not going to make a fuss. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
[ QUOTE ]
Player B wins because Player A essentially had a freeroll in these 2 positions. If LJ Smith and Hines Ward had gone off he would have kept his fat mouth shut and been like, "whew! Good thing Larry the commissioner wasn't home or I'd be out of the playoffs!!" If Player A wins it's a travesty, unless the commissioner would have retroactively made the substitutions if it caused Player A to lose. -James [/ QUOTE ] The changes should be made irregardless of what points the players scored or what effect they have on the outcome. Unless the league has some stated rule that it's not the commish's job to make roster changes at the request of players. If there's players who've had the commish make roster changes before then this isn't REMOTELY close. If this is the first such incident all year, and there's no stated rule, then I can maybe see it. It's still a stupid decision but whatever. This is why you spell out all these types of rules ahead of time, by the way. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
[ QUOTE ]
If this is the first such incident all year, and there's no stated rule, then I can maybe see it. [/ QUOTE ] This league is in its second year and somthing like this has never come up before. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who should be sided with in this fantasy football situation?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If this is the first such incident all year, and there's no stated rule, then I can maybe see it. [/ QUOTE ] This league is in its second year and somthing like this has never come up before. [/ QUOTE ] So no one has ever called the commish to make a roster change? |
|
|