#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Was this check-rase correct?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Was my check-raise on the flop correct? [/ QUOTE ] No [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] i see why not? [/ QUOTE ] We don't know where the bet is coming from. Plus, if we don't bet we can't get the chance to 3-bet. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Was this check-rase correct?
[ QUOTE ]
Do we always 3-bet the river here without reads? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah,the possibility of 2 pair or worse Set far outweigh TQ and KK. Get that money in there. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Was this check-rase correct?
Can I find that table for later? LOL! 3 over cold-calls to a UTG+2 raise. Awesome.
On the flop, just bet out. The pot is large and you don't want it checked through. 3-bet if someone wants to push their flush draw. Turn is good. River, I hate that CO woke up. I'm probably going to 3-bet it also. Only QT and KK beat us here. Since I'd refuse to believe someone stayed in and caught a runner runner straight unless they showed me, and KK missed a few bets on the turn, I'd say we'll see 2-pair most often. But I could see QcTc playing this exactly like the CO did. If that's the case, I'd have rather lost to the flush..... nh. |
|
|