#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistically Possible???
[ QUOTE ]
OK...been tracking my beats today while 4-tabling Stars SnGos...here's what I have so far... KK v 69os (Lost) AK v A7os (Lost) AQ v A4h (Lost) KJ v K10 (Lost) A8h v K8os (Lost) QQ v A2os (Lost) Seriously, WTF??? These are situations where I'm well ahead on the flop and then boom, turn and river F**K me good. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, I feel your pain. When your running bad your running bad. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistically Possible???
Hand 1: fold preflop.
Hand 2: fold preflop. Hand 3: fold preflop. Hand 4: fold preflop. Hand 5: fold preflop. Hand 6: fold preflop. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistically Possible???
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1: fold preflop. Hand 2: fold preflop. Hand 3: fold preflop. Hand 4: fold preflop. Hand 5: fold preflop. Hand 6: fold preflop. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistically Possible???
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1: fold preflop. Hand 2: fold preflop. Hand 3: fold preflop. Hand 4: fold preflop. Hand 5: fold preflop. Hand 6: fold preflop. [/ QUOTE ] RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistically Possible???
I lost 3 times with a full house to quads in one session. Bummer.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistically Possible???
I just ran these through pokerstove, and OMFGLOL, it says 0% probability of having them all lose, so yeah it is statistically impossible! Definitive proof that online poker is teh rig.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistically Possible???
[ QUOTE ]
I just ran these through pokerstove, and OMFGLOL, it says 0% probability of having them all lose, so yeah it is statistically impossible! Definitive proof that online poker is teh rig. [/ QUOTE ] LMAO these happened all in succession so I was just wondering what the sample/(n!-1) equation came out to. thanks |
|
|