|
|
|
|
#3
11-10-2005, 09:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
I think the thing to consider is not whether he had the flush, but what's in his head? Hindsight says this:
I'm going to call this guy with my middle set anyways, so I'll slightly increase my equity by being the bettor, not the caller. And it worked out that he increased his equity more than he thought, since you folded. 
|
|
#4
11-10-2005, 09:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
Explain to me how you built a $6k pot on $2/$5 PL Omaha with just those raises.
I think this was play money as well...
|
|
#5
11-10-2005, 01:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
I make it more like $3000 or $4000. Maybe there was a straddle or a reraise preflop? That would account for it.
|
|
#6
11-10-2005, 05:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
I don't understand this post at all... anyone who plays CASH games at this limit would never lay this hand down for a 4 to 1 or maybe even 3 to 1 pot odds. 15 to 1... WTF... are you kidding me.
3 possible explanations... You're lying... It was play money... You're a trust fund baby that watches to much TV poker and I would like to gracefully invite you to my home game.
|
|
#7
11-10-2005, 05:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand this post at all... anyone who plays CASH games at this limit would never lay this hand down for a 4 to 1 or maybe even 3 to 1 pot odds. 15 to 1... WTF... are you kidding me." 1. learn some class. 2. no, you can come over to my cash game. it seems that LOGIC plays no role in your game, just probability.
|
|
#8
11-10-2005, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
I'm just saying... do you really play $5K Pot limit games and don't understand the catastrophy of folding any pot that is laying you 15 to 1?
I just think you and your friends are either playing a little out of your league... or money has little value.
|
|
#9
11-10-2005, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
this was real money. happend a couple years ago.
don't you guys care about the logic here? how the hell can a guy call a massive reraise with the second nut and no draws in 5 card omaha? then go all in for $400 into a $6000 pot at the end when the flush hits. and i had no clubs in my hand. i value logic highly in my game. it seemed asinine to put in $400 more. (of course i would have won) but the play seemed soooo stupid for me at the time. what an illogical call and bet for the other guy!!!
|
|
#10
11-10-2005, 07:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: folded $6000 pot for $400 on river.
[ QUOTE ]
this was real money. happend a couple years ago. don't you guys care about the logic here? how the hell can a guy call a massive reraise with the second nut and no draws in 5 card omaha? then go all in for $400 into a $6000 pot at the end when the flush hits. and i had no clubs in my hand. i value logic highly in my game. it seemed asinine to put in $400 more. (of course i would have won) but the play seemed soooo stupid for me at the time. what an illogical call and bet for the other guy!!! [/ QUOTE ] At this point, I fully believe I'm beaten here. However, I make the crying call like everyone else says because there's at least a 10% chance he's bluffing (always at least 10% chance, according to Harrington, right?) $400 means very little to someone playing at these stakes (and is properly bankrolled). Make the call. Curse when you lose. Scratch your head when you win.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
