#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why would they agree to do this?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Why does it make sense for the pros to do this cash game on TV? What are they getting out of it that makes it worthwhile? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] lol, they're playing a $300/600NL game with a min $100,000 buy-in and you're wondering why they are playing? Please tell me you're joking. [/ QUOTE ] Why would I be joking? What would your minimum buy-in be for 300/600 NL? I'm under the assumption that they could get this kind of game on their own, or play their regular 2000/4000 game or whatever they want. What do they gain from the TV exposure? More so than tournaments, I would think that holecams would give away a lot of information in cash games that those pros really don't want to reveal. Anyone have an answer? It's not just the draw of the game itself, is it? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why would they agree to do this?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why does it make sense for the pros to do this cash game on TV? What are they getting out of it that makes it worthwhile? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] lol, they're playing a $300/600NL game with a min $100,000 buy-in and you're wondering why they are playing? Please tell me you're joking. [/ QUOTE ] Why would I be joking? What would your minimum buy-in be for 300/600 NL? I'm under the assumption that they could get this kind of game on their own, or play their regular 2000/4000 game or whatever they want. What do they gain from the TV exposure? More so than tournaments, I would think that holecams would give away a lot of information in cash games that those pros really don't want to reveal. Anyone have an answer? It's not just the draw of the game itself, is it? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] they were paied to be there |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why would they agree to do this?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why does it make sense for the pros to do this cash game on TV? What are they getting out of it that makes it worthwhile? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] lol, they're playing a $300/600NL game with a min $100,000 buy-in and you're wondering why they are playing? Please tell me you're joking. [/ QUOTE ] Why would I be joking? What would your minimum buy-in be for 300/600 NL? I'm under the assumption that they could get this kind of game on their own, or play their regular 2000/4000 game or whatever they want. What do they gain from the TV exposure? More so than tournaments, I would think that holecams would give away a lot of information in cash games that those pros really don't want to reveal. Anyone have an answer? It's not just the draw of the game itself, is it? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] they were paied to be there [/ QUOTE ] And TV would attract more fishier fish at these buy ins than the equivilent in a casino could - imagine all the B list actors trying to get some exposure... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why would they agree to do this?
Most of them showed up just because they heard Phil Hellmuth would be there!
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why would they agree to do this?
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone have an answer? It's not just the draw of the game itself, is it? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] The hourly rate was secondary (like 1500/hour). It's the TV exposure ... Negreanu (and others) probably makes more through endorsements now than he does playing poker, and he only has this opportunity because of exposure like this. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why would they agree to do this?
[ QUOTE ]
The players were also paid an hourly rate to be part of the show that ended up being about $1250 per hour. [/ QUOTE ] I want a cut!! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why would they agree to do this?
"Anyone have an answer?"
they have egos that need serious feeding. |
|
|