Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:10 PM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: OT xx,xxx players on x,xxx tables

Programmers are lazy, yep. But in this case, that makes the latter more likely - they already have to look through each table in the database to find out that count - far easier to get the count of players on that table and do a sum I'd have thought, two birds with one stone. Especially if it's just a database query.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:10 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: OT xx,xxx players on x,xxx tables

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
From a programming point of view, I would say it's likelier that it's the number of connected sessions to their servers than the number of occupied seats.

[/ QUOTE ]

From a marketing point of view, I would say it is much more likely to be the one that gives the highest player count.

[/ QUOTE ]

programmers are lazy

[/ QUOTE ]

While true, it isn't very advanced programming to count a seat as a player. Furthermore, I doubt this would be left up to the programmers to decide, but a management decision.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:15 PM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: galapagos islands of course
Posts: 825
Default Re: OT xx,xxx players on x,xxx tables

[ QUOTE ]
programmers are lazy

[/ QUOTE ]

i prefer to think i am apathetic
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2005, 02:04 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: OT xx,xxx players on x,xxx tables

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
programmers are lazy

[/ QUOTE ]

i prefer to think i am apathetic

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm definitely lazy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:54 PM
stupidsucker stupidsucker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 33
Default Re: OT xx,xxx players on x,xxx tables

From a marketing point of view, I would say it is much more likely to be the one that gives the highest player count.

Bingo.

So based on this thread . . . no one really knows?

I think the number is not individual, but rather a count of pixel players. From a marketing and programming point of view I think that counting the tables and the tally (which they already do) would be the easiest and most effective way. If they don't do it that way I would be surprised.

Thanks for the input...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2005, 02:30 PM
Big Limpin' Big Limpin' is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 298
Default Re: OT xx,xxx players on x,xxx tables

[ QUOTE ]

During the last two months, new-player signups have averaged 2,455 a day, and PartyGaming remains confident that it will achieve its goal of signing up 800,000 players this year.

The number of unique active players increased from 443,000 in September to 487,000 in November and the daily average number of players increased from 131,000 in the third quarter to 138,000 the last two months.

PartyGaming will release its full fourth quarter report at the end of January.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bolded the important part. I think 180k over hte whole day is in line with primetime having ~60k distinct players, not player-tables.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2005, 02:38 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OT xx,xxx players on x,xxx tables

It says x amount of tables are open and they have y amount of seats occupied in them. I say definition 2
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.