|
|
|
|
#1
12-16-2005, 08:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
There are a huge number of fish at the $109s, we regulars there just don't like to say too much about it.
Obviously if I knew either of these players was in any way sane (i.e. I had seen them before, or knew them to be 2p2 or whatever), I'd fold with the quickness. 
|
|
#2
12-16-2005, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
This kind of insanity at the 109s!!!!????
Good god.
|
|
#4
12-16-2005, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
I'd have pushed. The minraise means (meant) nothing and the bet is a classic probe. The call is a ten or some crap way more than a set.
I don't really *hate* your fold, but I hope you don't try it with queens.
|
|
#5
12-16-2005, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
Yes there's no way the first guy to bet on this flop has anything much. A ten, and that's it. The middle guy is perhaps a minor worry/irritant, but without any reads on him I'm certainly not putting him on QQ+ or a set. If he was a known decent player, that's when I would seriously consider folding.
|
|
#6
12-16-2005, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
[ QUOTE ]
I'd have pushed. The minraise means (meant) nothing and the bet is a classic probe. The call is a ten or some crap way more than a set. I don't really *hate* your fold, but I hope you don't try it with queens. [/ QUOTE ] Interestingly enough, I put one of them on QQ, so if I hold QQ, I probably don't fold.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
