#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">En respuesta a:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">En respuesta a:</font><hr /> Your first try at the SB winner has the same chance as the second. [/ QUOTE ] 1/32? [/ QUOTE ] 0. The Pats will win again. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Your first try at the SB winner has the same chance as the second. [/ QUOTE ] 1/32? [/ QUOTE ] 0. The Pats will win again. [/ QUOTE ] Because they still have Tom Brady, and quite frankly, that's all you need. <insert stupid shimmy> |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Your first try at the SB winner has the same chance as the second. [/ QUOTE ] 1/32? [/ QUOTE ] 0. The Pats will win again. [/ QUOTE ] Because they still have Tom Brady, and quite frankly, that's all you need. <insert stupid shimmy> [/ QUOTE ] *puke* |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
Do you really think the Bears will finish ahead of the Lions and the Packers with Kyle Orton? (not to mention the rest of the offense) [/ QUOTE ] You mean a solid offensive line, a pro bowl Wide Receiver and two quality running backs? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Do you really think the Bears will finish ahead of the Lions and the Packers with Kyle Orton? (not to mention the rest of the offense) [/ QUOTE ] You mean a solid offensive line, a pro bowl Wide Receiver and two quality running backs? [/ QUOTE ] I dont' think any other NFC Central team is that great that the Bears can't take the division. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
I dont' think any other NFC Central team is that great that the Bears can't take the division. [/ QUOTE ] I think 8-8 wins that divison. The defenses are so bad in that divison the Bears might actually have a chance. Optimism reigns supreme in the first week. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Your first try at the SB winner has the same chance as the second. [/ QUOTE ] 1/32? [/ QUOTE ] 0. The Pats will win again. [/ QUOTE ] Because they still have Tom Brady, and quite frankly, that's all you need. <insert stupid shimmy> [/ QUOTE ] Very nice. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I dont' think any other NFC Central team is that great that the Bears can't take the division. [/ QUOTE ] I think 8-8 wins that divison. The defenses are so bad in that divison the Bears might actually have a chance. Optimism reigns supreme in the first week. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I don't think they're worse off with Orton than any of the alternatives. I agree -- the defense is healthy and is going to be awesome this year. The O-Line is greatly improved and the run game will be good. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
Because they still have Tom Brady, and quite frankly, that's all you need. <insert stupid shimmy> [/ QUOTE ] Hahaha, hilarious. I always laugh when I see this on TV. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The 2006 Super Bowl Champion is....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I dont' think any other NFC Central team is that great that the Bears can't take the division. [/ QUOTE ] I think 8-8 wins that divison. The defenses are so bad in that divison the Bears might actually have a chance. Optimism reigns supreme in the first week. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I don't think they're worse off with Orton than any of the alternatives. I agree -- the defense is healthy and is going to be awesome this year. The O-Line is greatly improved and the run game will be good. [/ QUOTE ] I am less than thrilled with the line. I imagine C is the only line position we are above average. Maybe Tait fits that description but the guards and Fred miller don't. |
|
|