#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 10-20 NL bluff
65 seems like a weak stab at the pot from an unknown. This is clearly not an exact science though. Basically my check-raise only has to work here like 55 percent of the time to be +EV. Do u think he is calling this check-raise half the time? There is a good chance he is folding everything but TPGK, a set or an overpair...I dont think he has those hands a majority of the time
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 10-20 NL bluff
Hiatus,
Looks good to me. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 10-20 NL bluff
[ QUOTE ]
65 seems like a weak stab at the pot from an unknown. This is clearly not an exact science though. Basically my check-raise only has to work here like 55 percent of the time to be +EV. Do u think he is calling this check-raise half the time? There is a good chance he is folding everything but TPGK, a set or an overpair...I dont think he has those hands a majority of the time [/ QUOTE ] this is incorrect logic. Also he needs to fold to your checkraise far less than 50% of the time for it to be profitable. Dont forget that your allowed to hit the turn. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 10-20 NL bluff
yea I remembered I could hit the turn, I didnt do the exact calculations so I decided to stay cautious with the number...but I knew it was favorable.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 10-20 NL bluff
I think you can C/R for less and accomplish the same result.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party 10-20 NL bluff
I like it but I agree that you could probably make it just $200 and get same results.
|
|
|