#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'ve been looking for a good book on game theory
Try checking out this book
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...ce&s=books No poker, just game theory--all the equilibrium concepts. No really usefull for poker--except heads up. Aids in understanding the inportance of bluffing frequency to increase EV. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
books
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone know of a good introductory book for game theory? I've been looking for a book that emphasizes a pure mathematical approach to game theory. [/ QUOTE ] Not many introductory books would be overly rigorous. At one extreme is Fudenburg and Tirole, which is a graduate level book for economists. Hard core. I don't recommend that to anyone other than a PhD student with lots of time to study it. At the other extreme, I would recommend Dixit and Nalebuff. This is not mathematical, and introduces game theoretic reasoning by examples. Basically written for MBA-types. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...72815?v=glance In the middle are books by Myerson and by Binmore---more mathematical, and at the advanced undergrad level. Dated but good. The Gibbons book someone already references is also good; a quicker read than any of these, it introduces basic ideas. alThor |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: books
I'll second the Binmore recommendation: his text "Fun and Games" is very solid, in my opinion. Technical but still readable.
If you don't already know a lot about game theory, you may be disappointed to find that it won't help you with your poker game except in a very general way, or in very specific situations. Binmore actually uses some of the classic poker examples (von Neumann himself was a player it seems) but they are all restricted to a radically simplified, heads-up form of the game in order to keep the calculations tractable. If you play a lot of heads-up matches, you might gain something directly from this type of analysis, but for full-table low-limit ring games, game theory is not really required. |
|
|