Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-27-2004, 08:57 PM
cbruno cbruno is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: I\'ve been looking for a good book on game theory

Try checking out this book
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...ce&s=books

No poker, just game theory--all the equilibrium concepts.

No really usefull for poker--except heads up. Aids in understanding the inportance of bluffing frequency to increase EV.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-28-2004, 12:02 PM
alThor alThor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6
Default books

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone know of a good introductory book for game theory? I've been looking for a book that emphasizes a pure mathematical approach to game theory.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not many introductory books would be overly rigorous.

At one extreme is Fudenburg and Tirole, which is a graduate level book for economists. Hard core. I don't recommend that to anyone other than a PhD student with lots of time to study it.

At the other extreme, I would recommend Dixit and Nalebuff. This is not mathematical, and introduces game theoretic reasoning by examples. Basically written for MBA-types.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...72815?v=glance

In the middle are books by Myerson and by Binmore---more mathematical, and at the advanced undergrad level. Dated but good. The Gibbons book someone already references is also good; a quicker read than any of these, it introduces basic ideas.

alThor
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-28-2004, 03:11 PM
jtr jtr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 310
Default Re: books

I'll second the Binmore recommendation: his text "Fun and Games" is very solid, in my opinion. Technical but still readable.

If you don't already know a lot about game theory, you may be disappointed to find that it won't help you with your poker game except in a very general way, or in very specific situations. Binmore actually uses some of the classic poker examples (von Neumann himself was a player it seems) but they are all restricted to a radically simplified, heads-up form of the game in order to keep the calculations tractable. If you play a lot of heads-up matches, you might gain something directly from this type of analysis, but for full-table low-limit ring games, game theory is not really required.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.