|
|
|
|
#5
12-07-2005, 04:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: my little secret
fair enough. I did beat him into the pot. He had 66 and of course I spiked an A and MHIG.
All in all i think calling is the right play despite the results. Once I flatcall preflop its probably correct to go broke on most flops that arent monotone or JT9 or something like that. 
|
|
#6
12-07-2005, 04:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: my little secret
Yeah I know that I was thinking it was a call. The more I thought about it tonight I got to thinking of all the min bets I had faced in this situation and they are sets a massive percentage of the time.
The logic is that the set is likely way ahead a majority of the time so they bet a little. Even if the other person has KQ or 89 for some reason and in those very few situations where they hit on the turn and you make a bad call with a set that is now behind----you still have a lot of outs to fill up on the river. The other 95% of the time even them calling your $10 bet is a +EV move for the person with the set. This is the only reasoning I can think of for the stupid min bets in these situations.
|
|
#9
12-06-2005, 11:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: my little secret
[ QUOTE ]
The way you opted to play it means u should call it [/ QUOTE ] I hate it when people say this. Obviously his hand is disguised. But villain's action seems to indicate he doesn't care at all what hero has. I can just see villain thinking "i'll just throw out a little bait with $10-see if anybody'll play with me. oh sweet! this guy's raising me...he must have something. all in." Do you guys think that KK bets $10 here? Or any hand that's afraid of giving up free cards? POSSIBLY KQ but I'd say TT and JJ are way too big a part of his range to be calling here.
|
|
#10
12-06-2005, 11:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: my little secret
Why does a set bet $10 more than KK or AA here?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
