Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-05-2004, 12:54 AM
Analyst Analyst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 153
Default Bay101 Shooting Stars update

[ QUOTE ]
Chris is a very nice guy and I've played a bit with him over the past few days. He also plays TOURNAMENTS very well. He's one of the chip leaders at the end of Day 1 at Bay 101 this week, and I think he's got as good a shot as any at making the final table.

[/ QUOTE ]

QUASI-SPOILER WARNING/Shooting Stars Update
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Stopped in on my way home from work to see who was left. It was down to 17 players, and the "name" players left were Dan Negreanu, Phil Gordon and - Chris Moneymaker. The buzz was that Moneymaker really can play tournaments.

Negreanu looked to be somewhat short-stacked (50-60k?), Moneymaker average (just over 100k), and Gordon was probably the chip leader with a huge stack of over 300k.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-05-2004, 02:53 AM
jayadd jayadd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 193
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
Well, after talking w/ JA Sucker last night, all I'll say is that Chris might have some work to do on his 20-200 spread limit game.

[/ QUOTE ]

are you kidding me Why on earth would he need work. Anyone of us with an IQ over 30 (Varkoni misses the cut at 28) would enjoy the ability to make what ever mistakes he posibly can. The guy is set for life. He is probably the first WSOP champion or any major tourney winner of 1 million or more who was able to say " this was fun but not what i want to do for a living."
Some people are so fast to become critics when someone succeeds. No one has mentioned Varkoni and his idiotic comments he made that the camera caught. (as you can tell i have issues with varkoni but thats for another time)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-05-2004, 03:16 AM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, after talking w/ JA Sucker last night, all I'll say is that Chris might have some work to do on his 20-200 spread limit game.

[/ QUOTE ]

are you kidding me Why on earth would he need work. Anyone of us with an IQ over 30 (Varkoni misses the cut at 28) would enjoy the ability to make what ever mistakes he posibly can. The guy is set for life. He is probably the first WSOP champion or any major tourney winner of 1 million or more who was able to say " this was fun but not what i want to do for a living."
Some people are so fast to become critics when someone succeeds. No one has mentioned Varkoni and his idiotic comments he made that the camera caught. (as you can tell i have issues with varkoni but thats for another time)

[/ QUOTE ]

Huh? What is your point? The guy obviously is interested in playing poker. Why wouldn't he need work on games that he's not terribly good at?

If I recall, the WSOP he won was worth 2M or so. He sold how much of his action, 20%, maybe more? Let's say 20%, that leaves him w/ 1.6M. After taxes that's about 800k. That's a nice chunk of money, but that's just about enough to buy a not terribly nice home around where I live. Of course, that money goes a lot farther in Tennessee, but buy a house, pay some bills, etc. and it would be pretty easy to lose the rest in big poker games. So, yes, if he's going to play high limit poker (and I'm not talking about a little 20-200 spread game), he definitely should work on his game where it needs work.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-05-2004, 05:23 AM
krazyace5 krazyace5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 461
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

Gotta know, What did Varkoni say or do, that was before I started watching poker.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-05-2004, 05:27 AM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone of us with an IQ over 30 (Varkoni misses the cut at 28) would enjoy the ability to make what ever mistakes he posibly can. The guy is set for life. He is probably the first WSOP champion or any major tourney winner of 1 million or more who was able to say " this was fun but not what i want to do for a living."


[/ QUOTE ]

I think its funny that you mention Varkoni here since MM is the one who seems to be taking a shot at this whol ehigh stakes poker thing and Varkoni is the guy who seems to be happy to sit back and enjoy his $Million.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-05-2004, 05:30 AM
Ruddiger Ruddiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 110
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

moneymaker made the final 6

Phil Gordon 1,238,000
2 Masoud Shojaei 416,000
3 Chris Moneymaker 215,000
4 Scott Wilson 203,000
5 Mark Mache 175,000
6 Susan Kim 172,000
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-05-2004, 10:19 AM
M.B.E. M.B.E. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
If I recall, the WSOP he won was worth 2M or so. He sold how much of his action, 20%, maybe more? Let's say 20%, that leaves him w/ 1.6M. After taxes that's about 800k.

[/ QUOTE ]
That can't be right; even if the top marginal rate is 50%, surely it doesn't kick in until at least 400K. I always thought that in Canada the tax rate was much higher than in the U.S., but here the top marginal rate (federal and provincial combined) is less than 50%.

Also keep in mind that Nevada (where he earned the money) has no state income tax. I don't know if Moneymaker would have to pay Tennessee state income tax on his win, but I doubt it.

Also I think his gross prize was closer to $2.5M than $2M.

So I don't really know, but I suspect that after taxes he'd be left with considerably more than 800K.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-05-2004, 10:20 AM
eMarkM eMarkM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,170
Default Another Shooting Star update (spoiler)

We'll get to see Chris play on the WPT:

Standings going into final table:

Seat 1 Chris Moneymaker 215,000 Chips

Seat 2 Susan Kim 172,000 Chips

Seat 3 Masoud Shojaci 416,000 Chips

Seat 4 Mark Macha 175,000 Chips

Seat 5 Scott Wilson 203,000 Chips

Seat 6 Phil Gordon 1,238,000 Chips

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-05-2004, 10:30 AM
driller driller is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 24
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

In the immortal words of Jim Rome: "Scoreboard"
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-05-2004, 10:38 AM
M.B.E. M.B.E. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

I liked this article by Jay Greenspan about playing in a game with Moneymaker at Foxwoods. The article is on pokersavvy.com.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.