|
View Poll Results: 4 v 20 | |||
D | 23 | 35.94% | |
T | 41 | 64.06% | |
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Conclusion...
well it seems statistical theory doesn't lie.
as your bb/100 goes up, so should your variance. you winning mid/high nl guys seem to have a very large variance (more so than at limit, which is counter to prevailing thoughts) and very high reterns. so what is a PTBB? is it different than a big blind? or a big bet (2xbb)? -Barron |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conclusion...
I always thought that the variance, per se, was bigger for NL, but risk/reward was lower so the RoR was less. No?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conclusion...
[ QUOTE ]
what is a PTBB? [/ QUOTE ] PT BB is 2x big blind (big bet in limit, 2x big blind in NL). |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conclusion...
This month, my SD is at 50 BB/100 (25k hands of 3/6 and 5/10). Over my whole database of 100k hands, including about 30k at stakes under 2/4, I'm at 58 BB/100.
Edit: To get an approximately equivalent game, multiply the big blind of the NL game by about 4 or 5 and that will be the big bet of a limit game. If I wanted to do some math, I could figure something out of this. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard Deviation of those of you who use pokertracker.
pardon my ignorance, but where do you find the SD in PT?
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard Deviation of those of you who use pokertracker.
[ QUOTE ]
pardon my ignorance, but where do you find the SD in PT? [/ QUOTE ] Click on "More Detail" in the upper right on the sessions tab |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard Deviation of those of you who use pokertracker.
Ok - my SD is 40 Big bets / 100 (at 5/10 ~ $800)
my winrate is roughly 10 Big bets / 100 (at 5/10 ~ $200) I'm not sure how this would compare to limit - but as a thought experiment, assume I made the same rate but at 3 big bets / 100 for limit poker, so this would be roughly a 30/60 game. If my big bet SD was 15, then that would be $1000 / 100, which would be more than what I have at no-limit ($800 / 100). Also, 3BB / 100 at limit is probably a rate only single-tabling experts could attain, thus NL has much less variance. Make sense? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard Deviation of those of you who use pokertracker.
I think I am the winner... Standard Deviation of 66BBs/100. This may be affected by my recent loss of 7BBs in 1 day. I've played 23K+ hands and my BB/100 has dropped to a little over a measly 2BBs/100.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard Deviation of those of you who use pokertracker.
hmmm
33BB/100 over 24k hands of 10/20 NL mostly full table 44BB/100 over 37k hands of 5/10 NL 6 max |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard Deviation of those of you who use pokertracker.
Ask kanekungfu or strassa or GoG, to name a few.
|
|
|