Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-14-2004, 05:44 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 382
Default Re: Faulty Analysis in Hellmuth Cardplayer Column

I come up with;

AKo/KQo/99
34%/21%/45%
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-14-2004, 12:16 PM
ToledoTommy ToledoTommy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 61
Default Re: Faulty Analysis in Hellmuth Cardplayer Column

[ QUOTE ]
Hard to believe someone with his ego would publicise that unless it was for image purposes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think almost everything Phil does on TV and writes is used to generate ink and feed his supersized ego. He doesn't care about being despised by the world, he eats it up.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-14-2004, 12:32 PM
reubenf reubenf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 85
Default Re: Faulty Analysis in Hellmuth Cardplayer Column

I know slickpoppa said it was KQo, but the article says KQs.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-14-2004, 04:28 PM
slickpoppa slickpoppa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: the cream, the clear
Posts: 631
Default Re: Faulty Analysis in Hellmuth Cardplayer Column

My b on that. So he's more like a 3-3.4:1 dog depending on whether the ace or one of the nines is the same suit as the KQ. Nevertheless, he is nowhere near a 2.5:1 dog as Hellmuth suggests. My main point was that Hellmuth made a justification for the call based on a heads up analysis.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.